Comment on US couple blocked from suing Uber after crash say daughter agreed to Uber Eats terms
PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 day agoDisney is obviously just obfuscating their liability by running the restaurant as a separate entity. The restaurant can’t operate without following Disney’s rules. By all intents and purposes the restaurant is controlled by Disney and Disney either knew or should have known that the restaurant was putting people at risk.
ZMonster@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Your uninformed conjecture is not fact or truth.
PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Show me the lease agreement that says I’m wrong. I guarantee it’s much different than a standard commercial lease with more stringent requirements. If Disney is making specific requirements then they have a duty to enforce them.
ZMonster@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I appreciate your concerns, but truly: I owe you nothing. It takes very little integrity to make an uninformed allegation and then sit back with a smug look and a mug full of selfrighteousness decrying “prove me wrong”.
Why don’t you prove Legal Eagle wrong? It would without a doubt be more fruitful because I’m not entertaining it.
PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Then why did they attempt to invoke the terms of an unrelated service rather than having the case dismissed outright? Makes no sense.