Comment on YouTube’s anti-ad blocking test gets even pushier with a new timer
dbilitated@aussie.zone 1 year agothe users do get paid though, although i’m sure it’s a fraction of what youtube makes.
beckerist@lemmy.world 1 year ago
[deleted]beckerist@lemmy.world 1 year ago
[deleted]AbsolutelyNotABot@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I’m sorry but I find this deeply comic and I can’t stop giggle
At the same time, clickbait has always existed. There’s a reason trash emerged from tv to become his own subgenre
ours@lemmy.film 1 year ago
The DeArrow extension “fixes” thumbnails on Youtube to make them less clickbaity. Sadly content makers have to do it if they want the blessings of the algorithm god.
deweydecibel@lemmy.world 1 year ago
We actually don’t know what percentage they’re making. They can tell you how much they’re paid, but no one but Google can tell you how much of the subscription cost goes to them versus Google.
ironic_elk@kbin.social 1 year ago
This was maybe 5 or so years ago, but I remember Game Grumps did mention something along the lines of how they get more from someone watching their video on YouTube premium vs someone who watches their videos with ads playing.
It's still not a ton of info, and I'm not sure if it's still true. Or maybe it's different for every channel or something.
Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
It’s such a disgustingly low number most people would be disgusted.
We’re talking a few bucks for a million views.
TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 1 year ago
the big guys get sponsors to fund them, not ad revenue
Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
That’s a symptom of a broken system. It’s literally users creating their own ads because the platform’s ads aren’t getting them paid.
On a related note, you can skip those ads with a plugin, or the right app on Android and Android TV.
Kosmo@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
It’s about 1$ per 1000 views. Source: my small YT channel.
metaStatic@kbin.social 1 year ago
cpm = cents per million
reddig33@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Hmmm. $20 a month for the big budget action of Westworld, or $20 a month for a cooking show filmed in someone’s basement. Decisions, decisions.
Wolf_359@lemmy.world 1 year ago
To be fair, YouTube has far more variety and far more content overall. Personally, I have seen pretty much anything worth watching on the major streaming services. My wife and I can pretty much just ignore any top 200 list of shows or movies because we have already seen it all and anything we haven’t seen doesn’t look interesting to us. We pretty much just have to wait for new shows to come out.
YouTube though. It’s functionally unlimited considering the length of a human lifespan.
For some insight, a quick Google search says that Netflix has about 4 years of content if you sat down and watched everything they have to offer. Meanwhile, YouTube has about 18,000 years of content.
visualfeast@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Are they including all those 10-hour long loop videos I uploaded?
HERRAX@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
I’d take 10h shreksophone over 3 of those 4 years worth of netflix content any day of the week!
NightOwl@lemmy.one 1 year ago
I’ve never been one to really get into the loop of watching YouTube endlessly. It’s felt like my use has been more like a search engine.
For me it’s not really been a great source of entertainment. At best background noise. Quantity of hours is a useless metric for me when most of it is stuff that feels like unnecessary content. I think it’s most telling that what makes YouTube watchable for me is sponsorblock with one of my most used functions skip to highlight, and blocktube to block the popular channels that dominate search results. And lately youtubetranscript to just save myself time watching and overly long 10+ minute long segment in favor of quickly skimming over the words.
I feel the algorithm promoting long videos has ruined the quality with now more videos trying to fit that minimum length.
ultimate_question@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The irony of this comment is you can find the cooking show but not Westworld on HBO lol
Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Or $20 for thousands of different channels of all kinds of content.
At least be honest about it.
NightOwl@lemmy.one 1 year ago
How much of those channels are actually quality content let alone manage to keep the attention of viewers to watch an entire video? It’s like a cable services advertising that it has thousands of channels. Videos that manage to hold my attention even for 10 minutes on YouTube has been rare, and mostly aided by 2x speeds to shorten it down by half.
Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’ve got close to 100 channels that I subscribe to and watch regularly. Probably another 300 that I watch occasionally. YouTube makes up 90% of my visual content. The other 10% being sports that isn’t broadcast on YouTube and stuff I watch with my wife.
YouTube has literally anything you could want in visual content.
If you’re having problem keeping your attention span focused, maybe go see a doctor or therapist for adhd or something? Because there is so much shit on YouTube that you should 100% be able to find content to suit you.
SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I watch documentaries on youtube 30-60 min on avg
dbilitated@aussie.zone 1 year ago
honestly i will watch westworld once, but i never use my netflix account but i watch stuff like physics lectures and chemistry videos all the time. i just find it fascinating, in a way scripted TV isn’t for me.
regbin_@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’d pay more for YouTube rather than HBO/Netflix. There’s much more content that interests me on YouTube.