Comment on YouTube has found a new way to load ads | AdGuard Blog

• scarabic@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I can point you to some people who need your money more than you do. Are you going to give it to them? Why not?? Doesn’t money flow to those who need it??? Isn’t that how this works???

  source

  • uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    It doesn’t, which informs the rise technical mitigations of YouTube’s terrible ad schemes. YouTube isn’t interested in a more egalitarian society but serving its shareholder masters, and it sucks even at that.

    YouTube subscriptions are not a good deal for the consumers, so they’re not going to be popular, which might serve to explain to you why everyone is not a paying subscriber, nor will they ever be.

    source

    • scarabic@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      All you have to do is look at other streaming services which are subscriber-only to see the truth of what I said. Even the ones that have ads are not doing backflips to cram them everywhere as the other commenter complained, because ads are just supplementary revenue, not primary. The subscription model is incredibly strong historically and currently. It’s patently ridiculous that you think you can wave it away so easily. You’ll also notice that most other subscriptions are cheaper than YT Premium - because they’re going for subscriber scale where YT has a powerful ad business in place that subscriptions replace.

      If you’re not following me, I’ll simplify: if everyone on YT has to subscribe, as on Netflix, it in fact would cost a lot less. But you don’t, so you get ads up the wazoo.

      I’m even more baffled by your criticism that YT cares more about shareholders than creating an egalitarian society. Thats true of literally every business including the one you work for. YT never said they were trying to make society egalitarian. Where do you even get that shit from?

      source

      • uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        I’m even more baffled by your criticism that YT cares more about shareholders than creating an egalitarian society. Thats true of literally every business including the one you work for. YT never said they were trying to make society egalitarian. Where do you even get that shit from?

        The pissed-off engineers that develop effective adblockers, for which there remains robust support.

        Much like the west coast oyster monopolies of the 1880s that were plagued by oyster pirates, YouTube is fighting a losing battle.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I can point you to some people who need your money more than you do. Are you going to give it to them? Why not?? Doesn’t money flow to those who need it??? Isn’t that how this works???

    i can point you to the basic fact that if i just keep my money, i can very well do more work with that money that i keep, rather than just giving it away to other people.

    Money doesn’t flow to those who need it, money flows to those who get it through commerce most effectively.

    source

    • scarabic@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      That’s exactly right!

      source