I would not trust these kind of dives in the mirror. IMHO RAID6 is the only way.
Comment on What are good harddrives to use with serves
avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 months agoThree-way mirror?
TheHolm@aussie.zone 3 months ago
avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
Due to risk of failure or risk of data corruption because the mirror can’t tell which drive is right when there’s a difference?
TheHolm@aussie.zone 3 months ago
ZFS or BTRF mirror will know which side is at fault due to checksums. I’m more concern about simultaneous falures of two disks. Rebuilding of a RAID puts lots of pressure on remaining disks, so probability that remaining one dies too is much higher. with RAID6 3 disks need to die to lost date, which is less likely but not impossible.
turmacar@lemmy.world 3 months ago
The second one.
Mirroring is good for speed and redundancy, but a storage mechanism with parity checks will all ways be more recoverable. And depending on the array you have far more storage available.
avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
I think data checksums allow ZFS to tell which disk has the correct data when there’s a mismatch in a mirror, eliminating the need for 3-way mirror to deal with bit flips and such.
peregus@lemmy.world 3 months ago
IMHO RAID6 is the only way.
Or SnapRaid
femtech@midwest.social 3 months ago
I just keep adding 2 more drives as it gets full. Not sure if that’s the best thing.