Comment

Comment on Fears for patient safety as GPs use ChatGPT to diagnose and treat illness

There’s a difference between using LLMs to edit text, provide ideas or give you information that you can double check because you have the subject matter experience. Relying on it as a substitute for skill when something important is at stake like someone’s well being is reckless at best.

source

Sort:hotnew top

YungOnions@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Sure, but the original quote was:

Everyone anywhere using one on the job should be fired

There’s no nuance there it’s just AI = bad. I agree that it’s shouldn’t, in its current form, be used as a substitute for skill in important situations. You’re totally right there.

source
- DonPiano@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  I never said AI = bad. AI is much broader and contains worthwhile and non-plagiarized approaches.
  
  If it’s worth doing, do it properly.
  
  source
  - echodot@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    No you did say that.
    
    You said anyone using an AI in any capacity should be fired. I have heard infinitely better takes from 4-year-olds and why they need more ice cream.
    
    source
    DonPiano@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    This is on a post about chatgpt use. Chatgpt is from the set of llms, which is a subset of ai.
    
    Ai is cool. The current batch of LLMs/PISS can leave.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
That’s not what was said. What was said was anybody using it in any capacity for any job should be fired.

Which is obviously a very, very stupid take.

source
- Mrkawfee@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  Yep I agree. Also I love your user name.
  
  source