Why the down votes? Bro asking a question and being legit curious, don’t be hating on someone that’s looking to challenge what they know just because it’s trivial to you.
Comment on Is this a triangle?
towerful@programming.dev 2 months agoWhat if it had 3 corners and 4 edges? Or 4 corners and 3 edges?
ByteJunk@lemmy.world 2 months ago
towerful@programming.dev 2 months ago
I feel my comment adds to the discussion and wants more details.
But it was too simply phrased.
I guess the details of such a question should be obvious. And if you need the details, the question doesn’t actually add the the discussion… It just seems idiotic!I felt like there might be a really cool scenario where a vertice isn’t considered a vertice.
Like, there actually might be some case on a 2d plane “where actually” applies.
I’m fine being wrongRightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Welcome to Lemmy, first time?
november@lemmy.vg 2 months ago
I don’t think that can be a thing.
towerful@programming.dev 2 months ago
Yeh, seems not
RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 2 months ago
If a shape has 3 corners and 4 edges, it is incomplete or open and therefore not a shape yet but a collection of edges.
A shape with 4 corners and 3 edges is not possible. An edge cannot have a corner in the middle of it, that would make it two edges.
towerful@programming.dev 2 months ago
I felt like adding something about the specific case of 180° between edges and a vertice.
Makes sense.
And I guess too many vertices means an open set of edges (ie not close, this not a shape).
I was kinda hoping for a strange edge case, like a mobius strip or Klein bottle.
I guess a mobius strip is a 2d representation of a 1d paradigm. And a klein bottle is a 3d representation of a 2d paradigm.
It would be too much to ask of a 1d representation of a ??d paradigm.