I think I worded this poorly. My point about being individually routable is that, that’s the only benefit IPv6 seems to have. Unless I’m missing something.
Comment on first nas network struggle
slazer2au@lemmy.world 2 days agoDo you not run a firewall? Because your concerns are 100% fixed with a statefull firewall.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 days ago
Or, just completely bypass any config by simply not using IP6 for an environment where it offers no advantage
slazer2au@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I’d rather not perpetuate the 30 year mistake NAT has truely become.
ogy@fedia.io 2 days ago
I ended up having to. I'd have liked to keep IPv6 on, but my router wasn't letting me permanently route the IPv6 traffic to my nas. something about my ISP using dynamic addresses so it would change periodically, and the router wouldn't accept the format of IP addresses that I generated.
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
Some ISPs just have a broken IPv6 implementation. If they do it correctly, they should delegate a /56 prefix that doesn’t change unless the DUID on your router changes or your PoP changes.