He isn’t on the project since last year. androguru
deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 2 months ago
Lead dev of grapheneos is extremely toxic in communication. I don’t trust someone like that developing the software running on a phone.
Kopy@lemmy.world 2 months ago
airglow@lemmy.world 2 months ago
FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 2 months ago
You can still be part of a project without being lead, to be part of the “we.” Did he contribute and/or is he part of GrapheneOS, yes? So he’s part of the “we.”
Or does only the lead developer get the “we?” Wouldn’t that make it more of an “I” instead?
airglow@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I was responding to a comment that claimed “he isn’t on the project since last year”. Based on his activity on social media, he is clearly still in the project.
vga@sopuli.xyz 2 months ago
You should remember that he founded the original CopperheadOS project (from which he was violently ousted by his cofounder) and has been working on it and this for a decade.
deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 2 months ago
Kopy@lemmy.world 2 months ago
It states that he is the “Founder of @GrapheneOS”, not the current lead developer. So I don’t get your point
deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 2 months ago
His activity on GrapheneOS repositories, issues, etc. indicates he’s still very active in development and in the community.
vga@sopuli.xyz 2 months ago
I know Daniel somewhat, and calling him extremely toxic is just wrong. He is and has always been rather bad at communication and is clearly on the spectrum in some way. Technically a genius person, but perhaps doesn’t have the right set of qualities to lead things.
Very good decision from him to withdraw from social media.
deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 2 months ago
is clearly on the spectrum in some way
This is not an excuse to behave the way he does.
Very good decision from him to withdraw from social media
He hasn’t, still on github, still on HN.
nutsack@lemmy.world 2 months ago
as long as they do good work i don’t give a shit what they think
shiftymccool@programming.dev 2 months ago
So? Bad people can make good things. We should all stop using Linux because Torvalds is a dick?
mr_pip@discuss.tchncs.de 2 months ago
might be toxic, but the os is brilliant
MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 2 months ago
[deleted]deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 2 months ago
Louis Rossman’s video describes his behavior in public spaces accurately: www.youtube.com/watch?v=4To-F6W1NT0
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Honestly, a lot of lead devs in fantastic FOSS software have pretty limited patience. I’ve read plenty of that guy’s discourse, and while I think he could be more diplomatic, I don’t see any reason to suspect he’s doing anything malicious with the project.
I’m personally totally fine using GrapheneOS. If you aren’t, there are plenty of alternatives.
deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 2 months ago
“Limited patience” is understandable, but the behavior of the GrapheneOS dev is completely different. I’ve personally interacted with them not too long ago, and nothing has changed since the public accusations from a year ago.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
That’s fair. I personally don’t interact with him, nor do I plan to (why would I?), so it really doesn’t bother me. As long as the other devs can manage dealing with him and the quality of the code stays high, I’m happy. If the other devs leave the project, I’ll look for forks.