citc@zotum.net
@citc@zotum.net@zotum.net
This is a remote user, information on this page may be incomplete. View original ↗
- Comment on Accessibility improvement needed 1 week ago: @*_jߍyrope
There is little value to tell users to "find other themes" if user must be either a hub server administrator or has knowledge (how?) about the themes available on a server at registration stage. - Submitted 1 week ago to adminsforum@hubzilla.org | 0 comments
- Comment on Accessibility improvement needed 1 week ago: @Jupiter Rowland
Deep thought, thanks to share.
How does someone install the 'solidified' theme please? - Comment on Accessibility improvement needed 1 week ago: @Harald Eilertsen
Demanding that someone else should spend their free time
Consideration of accessibility at the design stage should not require any "someone else", because it is a default collective mentality.
As an example cited elsewhere, the decision to use some "fancy slider" demonstrates the collective problem: _no-one_ is (apparently?) available at the _design_ stage to even think deeply, conceptively about the process which led to "fancy slider" being agreed to be a good a idea. No-one is at individual fault, it is systemic which may be due to "group think". Either widen the pool or deepen the awareness, to minimise such problems. - Comment on Accessibility improvement needed 1 week ago: @Alfred Bühler
There is an English phrase hopefully similar in other languages: "cannot see the wood for the trees". - Comment on Accessbility at design stage 4 weeks ago: @Der Pepe (Hubzilla) ⁂
How should 'bootstrap' ecmascript be replaced if part of core code? - Comment on Channel content acceptance 1 month ago: @Jupiter Rowland
There no request for superblock functionality nor non-authentication access people, only advice/direction to instructions at recommended configuration. - Comment on Channel content acceptance 1 month ago: @Der Pepe (Hubzilla) ⁂
Management of 'files' within a channel needs reduction in nerdy documentation, e.g. 'ocap' is meaningless. - Comment on Channel content acceptance 1 month ago: @Der Pepe (Hubzilla) ⁂
>By “may post content to the channel”, do you mean that other channels can post to your channel?
This 'channel' term is a confusion. A 'channel' has been created with the option 'forum', intention that people could post content to the channel.
> With the standard channel roles, this is only possible for connections.
The channel forum created, with no connections.
> In this case, you need to create your own contact role that allows wall posts and assign this to the desired connections.
No idea what a 'wall post' is. There are no instructions to create a contact role when no connections exist. - Comment on we need the option for offline reading 1 month ago: @Der Pepe (Hubzilla) ⁂
a local SQLite database would be perfectly adequate for storage)
Why would this be necessary?
Thought of the e-mail analogy where messages are accessible via 'mbox' format. - Submitted 1 month ago to adminsforum@hubzilla.org | 0 comments