xoron

@xoron@programming.dev

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Are Web Components better for Cybersecurity?⁩ ⁨⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  thanks for your thoughts.

  thats not quite what im asking. im wondering if there are nuanced benefits to using webcomponents over something like react. with the key difference being the native support.

  i hope with the webcomponent approach it could be “furture-proof” as it seems to be the rhetoric i hear around. im sure i wont have a great implementation any time soon, but id like to try out a few ideas to see if it holds-up. hopefully to lead to a “secure javascript ui framework” (which itself could be a whole discussion). i hope that by having it open source, i can point to an example to discuss and improve it.

  it seem for the messaging app refactor, i’ll be fine to use react on it. which is great because i already have a working-ish demo.

• Are Web Components better for Cybersecurity?
  Submitted ⁨⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ to ⁨experienced_devs@programming.dev⁩ | ⁨2⁩ ⁨comments⁩
• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨I have a fairly unique architecture where i have actively tried to make it as "browser-based" as possible.⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  Thanks!

  reddit.com/…/what_are_your_thoughts_on_subtlecryp…

  Tldr; I had that question before myself. It doesn’t seem to introduce any improvement over WebCrypto API which itself should have gone through peer-review and auditing. (“Choose your browser wisely” could be considered the advice here.)

  I’d like to still look into wasm for several other details of the project, but it seems the built-in browser cryptography functions are performant and generally pretty good if used correctly.

• I have a fairly unique architecture where i have actively tried to make it as "browser-based" as possible.positive-intentions.com ↗
  Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩ to ⁨experienced_devs@programming.dev⁩ | ⁨2⁩ ⁨comments⁩