NGram
@NGram@piefed.ca
- Comment on The Algorithm Finally Works For You 2 weeks ago:
The main post already badly downvoted so I probably shouldn’t even bother to engage, but this whole article is actually just showing a lack of knowledge on the subject. So here goes nothing:
Corporations have been running algorithms for decades.
Millennia*. We can run algorithms without computers, so the first algorithm way run way earlier than decades ago. And corporations certainly were invented before the last century.
Markets weren’t inefficient because technology didn’t exist to make them efficient. Markets were asymmetrically efficient on purpose. One side had computational power. The other side had a browser and maybe some browser tabs open for comparison shopping.
I suppose the author has never used all of those price-watching websites that existed before 2022. I also question how they think a price optimization algorithm is useful to a person who is trying to buy, not sell, something.
Consider what it took to use business intelligence software in 2015. […] Language models collapsed that overhead to nearly zero. You don’t need to learn a query language. You don’t need to structure your data. You don’t need to know the right technical terms. You just describe what you want in plain English. The interface became conversation.
You still need to structure your data because you need to be able to have the LLM understand the structure of your data. In fact, it is still easy enough to cause an LLM to misinterpret data that having inconsistently-structured data is just asking for problems… not that LLMs are consistent anyway. The existence of the idea of prompt engineering means that the interface isn’t just conversation.
The moment ChatGPT became public, people started using it to avoid work they hated. Not important work. Not meaningful work. The bureaucratic compliance tasks that filled their days without adding value to anything.
Oh ok better just stop worrying about that compliance paperwork because the author says it’s worthless. Just dump that crude oil directly on top of the nice ducks, no point in even trying to only spill it into their pond.
Compliance tasks are actually the most important part of work. They are what guarantee your work has worth. Otherwise you’re just an LLM – sometimes producing ok results but always wasting resources.
People weren’t using ChatGPT to think. They were using it to stop pretending that performance reviews, status update emails, and quarterly reports required thought.
Basically, users used it to create the layer of communication that existed to satisfy organizational requirements rather than to advance any actual goal.
Once again with the poor examples of things. If you can’t give a thoughtful performance review for the people who work below you, you’re just horrible at your job. Performance reviews aren’t just crunching some numbers and giving people a gold star. I’m sure sometime in the future I could pipe in all of the quick chats I’ve had with coworkers in the office and tell an LLM to consider them for generating a review, but that’s still not possible. So no, performance reviews do actually require thought. Status emails and quarterly reports can be basically summarizing existing data, so maybe they don’t require much thought but they still require some. This is demonstrable by the amount of clearly LLM-generated content that have become infamous at this point for containing inaccurate info. LLMs can’t think, but a thinking human could’ve reviewed that output and stopped that content from ever reaching anyone else.
This is very much giving me the impression the author doesn’t like telling others what they’re doing. They’d rather work alone and without interruption. I worry that they don’t work well in teams since they lack the willingness to communicate with their peers. Maybe one day they’ll realize that their peers can do work too and even help them.
You want the cheapest milk within ten miles? You can build that.
The first search result for “grocery price tracker” that I found is a local tracker started in 2022, before LLMs.
You want to track price changes across every retailer in your area? You can do that now
From searching “<country> price tracker”, I found Camel^3 which is famous for Amazon tracking and another country-specific one which has a ToS last updated in 2018. The author is describing things that could already be accomplished with a search engine.
You want something to read every clause of your insurance policy and identify the loopholes?
Lmao DO NOT use an LLM for this. They are not reliable enough for this.
You want an agent that will spend forty hours fighting a medical billing error that you’d normally just pay because fighting it would cost more in time than the bill? You can have that.
You know what? I take it all back, this is definitely proving Dystopia Inc. But seriously, that is a temporary solution to a permanent problem. Never settle for that. The real solution here is to task the LLM with sending messages to every politician and lobbyist telling them to improve the system they make for you.
The marginal cost of algorithmic labor has effectively collapsed. Using a GPT-5.2–class model, pricing is on the order of $0.25 per million input tokens and about $2.00 per million output tokens. A token is roughly three-quarters of a word, which means one million tokens equals about 750,000 words. Even assuming a blended input/output cost of roughly $1.50 per million tokens, you can process 750,000 words for about $1.50. War and Peace is approximately 587,000 words, meaning you can run an AI across one of the longest novels ever written for around a dollar. That’s not intelligence becoming cheaper. That’s the marginal cost of cognitive labor approaching zero.
Nevermind the irony of calling computers doing work “algorithmic labour”, this is just nonsense. Of course things built entirely on free labour are going to be monetarily cheap. Also, feeding War And Peace into an LLM as input tokens is not the same as training the LLM on it.
We are seeing the actual cost of LLM usage unfold and you’d have to be willingly ignoring it to think it was strictly monetary. The social and environmental impact is devastating. But since the original article cites literally none of its claims, I won’t bother either.
Institutions built their advantages on exhaustion tactics. They had more time, more money, and more stamina than you did. They could bury you in paperwork. They could drag out disputes. They could wait you out. That strategy assumed you had finite patience and finite resources. It assumed you’d eventually give up because you had other things to do.
An AI assistant breaks that assumption.
No, it doesn’t, unless you somehow also assume that LLMs won’t also be used against you. And you’d have to actually be dumb or have an agenda that required you to act dumb to assume that.
Usage numbers tell the story clearly. ChatGPT reached 100 million monthly active users in two months. That made it the fastest-growing consumer application in history. TikTok took nine months to hit 100 million users. Instagram took two and a half years. The demand was obviously already there. People were apparently just waiting for something like this to exist.
Here’s a handy little graph to show how the author is wrong: Time to 100M users. I’m sorry, I broke my promise about not citing anything. Notice how all of the time spans for internet applications trend downwards as time increases. TikTok took 9 months 7 years before ChatGPT was released. I bet the next viral app will be even faster than ChatGPT. That’s not an indicator of demand, that’s an indicator of internet accessibility. (I’m ignoring Threads because they automatically create 100M users from their Instragram accounts in 5 days, which is a measure of their database migration capabilities and nothing else.)
Venture capital funding for generative AI companies reached $25.2 billion in 2023 according to PitchBook data. That was up from $4.5 billion in 2022. Investment wasn’t going into making better algorithms. It was going into making those algorithms accessible.
I’m sorry, what? LLMs are an algorithm. Author clearly does not know what they are talking about.
DoNotPay, an AI-powered consumer advocacy service, claimed to help users fight more than 200,000 parking tickets before the company pivoted to other services. LegalZoom reported that AI-assisted document preparation reduced the time required to create basic legal documents by 60% in 2023.
I thought LLMs were supposed to be some magic interface for individuals. The author is describing institutions. You know, the thing the author started out bashing for controlling all the algorithms and using them against the common folk who didn’t have those algorithms. This is exactly the same thing, just replace algorithm with AI.
The credential barrier still exists. You can’t get a prescription from ChatGPT. The legal liability still flows through licensed professionals. The system still requires human gatekeepers. The question is how long those requirements survive when the public realizes they’re paying $200 for a consultation that an AI handles better for pennies.
Indeed, that will be an interesting thing to see once AI can actually handle it better and for cheaper. Though I wouldn’t count on in anytime soon. Don’t forget the AI at that stage will still have to compensate the human doctors who wrote the data it was trained on.
Oh, I just about hit the character limit. I guess I’ll stop there.
Remember folks, don’t let your LLM write an article arguing for replacing everyone with LLMs. All it proves is that you can be replaced by an LLM. Maybe focus on some human pursuits instead. - Comment on Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg 1 month ago:
Huh? It wasn’t bait, it was a simple statement about how they already have plenty of good options for donating. I brought up cryptocurrency because you mentioned it out of nowhere.
- Comment on Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg 1 month ago:
They link to their accepted donation methods in the article: https://ziglang.org/zsf/
No need for cryptocurrency when they accept real money.
- Comment on How One Uncaught Rust Exception Took Out Cloudflare 1 month ago:
No, the article is just not very precise with its words. It was causing the program to panic.
- Comment on GlitchTip 5.2 with design refresh and less system requirements 1 month ago:
GlitchTip makes monitoring software easy. Track errors, monitor performance, and check site uptime all in one place. Our app is compatible with Sentry client SDKs, but easier to run.
For those that have no idea what GlitchTip is, it’s a service tracing service like Sentry.
- Comment on ‘There isn’t really another choice:’ Signal chief explains why the encrypted messenger relies on AWS 2 months ago:
I don’t think that’s necessarily incompatible with what I suggested. They could just leave the backup servers offline until they’re actually needed which shouldn’t cost them anything (or at least not much; some cloud providers charge for a VM’s storage usage regardless).
Assuming that Signal’s servers were designed by competent engineers, the engineering cost to make a change like this shouldn’t be that bad. Though judging by Whittaker’s comments, that may be a bad assumption.
- Comment on Bloodlines 2 is losing a drinking buddy as spinoff Vampire: The Masquerade – Bloodhunt plans server shutdown 2 months ago:
So when are they releasing the servers for us to run?
Since I’m reasonably sure they won’t, anyone interested in writing a server emulator?
- Comment on ‘There isn’t really another choice:’ Signal chief explains why the encrypted messenger relies on AWS 2 months ago:
It is true that there really isn’t another cloud provider that they could choose. All of the other cloud providers (major and minor players) are prone to the same sort of systemic failure. But it isn’t true that they didn’t have another choice.
The solution to service failure is redundancy. Making the redundancy as different as possible makes it even more resilient. In this case, that would be having redundant servers on other cloud providers which can be used in the event that the main one fails. Even better if they can use all of them simultaneously to share the load and let failover happen more gracefully.
- Comment on [Mujin] It's Time to Accept That Nintendo is a Supervillain 2 months ago:
I guess now is better than later, but plenty of people already knew that litigious and rich companies are never good.
- Comment on The Ofcom Tea Party: 4Chan Lawyer publishes Ofcom correspondence, British regulator claims “sovereign immunity” to defend itself – and sovereign powers to regulate foreign companies 2 months ago:
The author's take is a bit baffling to me. Trying to apply the US constitutional amendments against a foreign government institution to protect a US company is dumb. Those amendments strictly apply to the US government. As long as the company provides services in the UK, they are subject to UK laws on those services. If I start shipping firearms from the US to the UK it'd be perfectly reasonable for the UK to stop those packages at the border and destroy them. Network packets don't just magically transcend borders.
The reasonable consequence of noncompliance is to block the service. Yes, that's essentially paving the way for a national internet filter like China's Great Firewall, but that's why we have to fight the entire law not just the enforcement of it.
The Online Safety Act is horrible and a nightmare for so many reasons, but arguing it's unenforceable on the grounds of being in a different country is just blatantly wrong.
- Comment on On January 1st of 2026, Texas will be required to give ID to download apps from the app stores. It doesn't matter if it's NSFW or not. 2 months ago:
They do use handheld and never define it, but I can hold my laptop with my hand so I’m not sure that’s necessarily a good way of disqualifying laptops. That also seems to strictly apply to the operating system ("runs an operating system designed […] for software applications on handheld electronic devices"), which might be a fun legal quagmire as well since Linux is designed for all sorts of platforms. If I install Linux on my (formerly) Windows laptop does it suddenly become a mobile device?
It does bring up another interesting niche of computers: handheld PCs, especially handheld gaming PCs. Does this law apply to Steam Decks?
This whole thing screams “written by tech illiterates” since it seems to ignore regular computers and only focus on phones when it’s all just variations of the same thing – form factor and the software running on top isn’t very relevant to whatever goal I presume they’re trying to achieve. If they really want to collect everyone’s ID, age, and other privacy-violating information they’d be better off doing it everywhere. But maybe I shouldn’t give out advice for speed running fascism…
- Comment on On January 1st of 2026, Texas will be required to give ID to download apps from the app stores. It doesn't matter if it's NSFW or not. 2 months ago:
That was my interpretation too, except not restricted to “modern” websites. It sounds more like any website, modern or not, JS or not.
The part that is funny in that situation is that probably means web browsers are considered “app stores”. From a technical standpoint that’s actually pretty accurate (though they also handle running the “app”, unlike a regular app store), but has the fun consequence of making web browsers also “app store stores”. Most browsers can be used without an account though, so I look forward to the dumb antics companies with large legal departments come up with for this one.
- Comment on On January 1st of 2026, Texas will be required to give ID to download apps from the app stores. It doesn't matter if it's NSFW or not. 2 months ago:
I've got no clue about legal documents, especially how they work in Texas, but this seems weirdly broad and with a pretty glaring loophole.
The weirdly broad part:
(2) "App store" means a publicly available Internet
website, software application, or other electronic service that
distributes software applications from the owner or developer of a
software application to the user of a mobile device.This sounds like any website suddenly becomes an app store as soon as it starts distributing software for a mobile device. So (ignoring my following point), if I suddenly post my new APK on my personal site suddenly it's an app store!? Also aren't websites software applications? That'll be a fun one to fight out with browsers...
(4) "Mobile device" means a portable, wireless
electronic device, including a tablet or smartphone, capable of
transmitting, receiving, processing, and storing information
wirelessly that runs an operating system designed to manage
hardware resources and perform common services for software
applications on handheld electronic devices.This sounds like it includes laptops but not desktop computers.
The glaring loophole:
(a) When an individual in this state creates an account with an app
store, the owner of the app store shall use a commercially
reasonable method of verification to verify the individual's age
category under Subsection (b).So if your app store does not require an account, you do not need to verify anyone's age!? I'm all for it but that doesn't seem to be in the spirit of the law. F-droid and my (example) personal-site-turned-app-store rejoice!
- Comment on Forgejo v13.0 is available 2 months ago:
More features that are preparing for full federation support! Exciting!
- Comment on Nvidia sells tiny new computer that puts big AI on your desktop 2 months ago:
Unfortunately Nvidia is also big tech so starving out (sort of) competitors doesn't help get rid of douchebags. It actually has the added risk of giving some of the douchebags a monopoly.
Buying one of those AMD Ryzen AI Max chips actually makes more sense now...
- Comment on [Eurogamer] Pokémon Legends: Z-A review 2 months ago:
a joyful proof of concept
Wow that's a sad thing to say about the second game in that (sub)series. Even the first should've been more than a proof of concept. It would be excusable for a $20 early access game on Steam to be a tech demo of this calibre, but not a $85 (CAD) game. It does interest me enough to consider eventually picking up a used copy do dump to my Steam Deck, which is about the highest complement I can offer a Nintendo game.
- Comment on ICE tries to kidnap random food delivery driver off the street. He jukes them on a foldable bike. 3 months ago:
Somebody needs to add yakety sax (aka Benny Hill theme) to it
- Comment on A Flagship Smartphone With Kill Switches? Meet the Murena-Powered HIROH Phone 3 months ago:
Yeah, so did I. I've got a Fairphone 4 which has midrange specs and a flagship price. But that wasn't my point; the article is wrong, the specs are not flagship territory.
Paying more for less is stupid, but paying more for things that others don't value so highly (e.g. a headphone jack, privacy, ethical production, durability, etc.) is actually smarter than buying the popular thing.
- Comment on A Flagship Smartphone With Kill Switches? Meet the Murena-Powered HIROH Phone 3 months ago:
Hopefully it sells better than the other phones on the market with hardware switches (e.g. PinePhone).
the phone is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8300 SoC, paired with 16 GB of RAM and 512 GB of internal storage. These specs place it firmly in flagship territory
That's not a flagship processor according to MediaTek; it's in their "premium" category (8000 series) which is one step down from their "flagship" category (9000 series). The RAM and storage seems possible to get on decent midrange/high-end phones in the USD $600-700ish range too. I found the Vivo V60 and OnePlus Nord 4 with similar specs pretty quickly. The Hiroh phone is definitely priced like a flagship though.
Now, I'm not saying flagship specs are really worth it these days (except maybe camera stuff), but this is definitely not a flagship phone.
- Comment on Exclusive: San Francisco scores long-term conference commitment from Visa 4 months ago:
I hope the Moscone Center didn't have to ban all LGBTQ+ and/or 18+ events to get Visa to commit