mlatpren

@mlatpren@lemmy.world

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Bad UX is keeping the majority of people away from Lemmy⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Does this extend to users? Currently, blocking on Lemmy.World with Thunder, if I block instance A, and a user from instance A interacts with instance B, I see that interaction.

  Mastodon et. al. block everything coming from that instance, unfollows everyone, the whole nine yards. So far, I can only block the communities for sure, and have to continue blocking each user I come across.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Bad UX is keeping the majority of people away from Lemmy⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I stand corrected. However:

  Neither Jerboa, the first app on join-lemmy.org and the one by the Lemmy devs, nor Lemmy.World’s own web interface gave me this option. I downloaded Thunder, Voyager, and Sync, and only Thunder gave me that as an option. When searching how to block instances, the top results are that you can’t (at least on DDG).

  So, unless I’m being incredibly stupid right now, I can block instances, but only if I use a specific app, or perhaps choose the “right” instance. That’s still very bad UX.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Bad UX is keeping the majority of people away from Lemmy⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  For me, a major issue isn’t even the UI. It’s federation control. On Mastodon & co, I can mute entire instances, cutting out A LOT of bullshit. On Lemmy, if I want that kind of control, I need to run my own instance. Doable, but kinda overkill.

  It’s one thing to hide individual subreddits on a centralised platform. It’s another thing entirely to have many sites building a big platform, with the same communities duplicated with different rules and followings. That’s just a game of wack-a-mole at that point.

  And if I don’t like the instance’s communities, chances are I don’t want to interact with its users either, leading to even more wack-a-mole.