AnonomousWolf
@AnonomousWolf@lemmy.world
- Comment on Seems a sensible precaution 1 week ago:
Yea the comments are all as I expected them to be
- Comment on AI is not bad for the environment in comparison with many other regular activities. 2 weeks ago:
Still a drop in the bucket compared to people taking flights to go on vacation.
If you’re not angry at people taking flights, you shouldn’t be angry at AI for environmental reasons.
There are plenty of other reasons to hate AI.
- Comment on AI is not bad for the environment in comparison with many other regular activities. 2 weeks ago:
Thanks, this is exactly my point
- Comment on Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment 2 weeks ago:
You can easily replace Beef in your diet with foods that aren’t as bad for the environment. It won’t taste the same but so what.
You can’t cry that nobody needs AI but then in the same breath say that you can’t replace beef Something 100x worse for the environment.
Yes nobody NEEDS AI, just like nobody NEEDS beef, or to take a flight, but it’s still a nice to have and useful to a lot of people.
- Comment on Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment 2 weeks ago:
There are many reasons to be Anti-AI, the biggest one for me is Privacy & Manipulation.
But saying AI is brining the planet is BS (when you compared to other basics)
- Comment on Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment 2 weeks ago:
Read the actual article, that’s my whole point. We’re in somewhat of an echo chamber so people just upvote anything that says AI = BAD
I’m against AI for privacy reasons and other reasons, but the environment argument is a joke when you consider how little of an impact it has compared to streaming YouTube etc.
- Comment on Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment 2 weeks ago:
It’s already included in the 3Wh calculation
- Comment on Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment 2 weeks ago:
Fair, it’s not bad in comparison with things like Beef or Streaming 4k
But it’s still bad
- Comment on AI IS BURNING THE PLANNET!! 2 weeks ago:
Probably still worse than a couple of AI prompts
- Comment on AI IS BURNING THE PLANNET!! 2 weeks ago:
Why are they nazi bar?
Genuinely curious IDK much about them
- Comment on AI IS BURNING THE PLANNET!! 2 weeks ago:
So is AI useless and just a bubble that will pop, or will it explode exponentially?
It can’t be both.
When talking about the environment people say it will explode and burn the planet, but in the same breath they will say it’s useless and just a bubble
- Comment on Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment 2 weeks ago:
Beef is useful? You could just eat chicken and other meats instead. And you be saving the environment 100x more than not using AI
- Comment on AI IS BURNING THE PLANNET!! 2 weeks ago:
We should stop watching 4k videos, it’s killing the environment, it’s worse than AI
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to [deleted] | 31 comments
- Comment on Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment 2 weeks ago:
My point is that people shouting that they care about the environment, while being silent on things like beef or flights etc. are being hypocrites. I’ve seen many people say AI IS BURNING THE PLANNET, when that is simply not true
- Comment on AI is not bad for the environment in comparison with many other regular activities. 2 weeks ago:
My sources account for the training.
Even if you add a zero to AI’s CO2 emissions and water usage, it’s still a drop in the bucket compared to eating beef or taking a flight for holiday
- Comment on AI is not bad for the environment in comparison with many other regular activities. 2 weeks ago:
This is exactly my point
- Comment on AI is not bad for the environment in comparison with many other regular activities. 2 weeks ago:
Look at my sources, it accounts for the training of the AI etc.
- Comment on Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment 2 weeks ago:
And that would still be a drop in the bucket compared to beef or taking a flight.
You’re missing my point
- Comment on Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment 2 weeks ago:
Fair, but people are shouting that AI is destroying the planet, and pretending like it’s worse than cars or beef or flights.
Which weakens actuall reasons to be anti-AI
- Comment on AI is not bad for the environment in comparison with many other regular activities. 2 weeks ago:
You’re completely missing my point.
Streaming 4k video uses a lot more, should we also critique people who stream video?
- Comment on AI is not bad for the environment in comparison with many other regular activities. 2 weeks ago:
Check the sources, that does account for training.
Even if we went with 10wh, it’s still a drop in the bucket compared to other lifestyle choices we make
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to technology@lemmy.world | 45 comments
- Comment on Lemmy be like 2 weeks ago:
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to controversial@sh.itjust.works | 23 comments
- Comment on Lemmy be like 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on Lemmy be like 2 weeks ago:
If you ever take a flight for holiday, or even drive long distance and cry about AI being bad for the environment then you’re a hypocrite.
Same goes for if you eat beef, or having a really powerful gaming rig that you use a lot.
- Comment on PieFed.World is now open 1 month ago:
Fantastic
- Submitted 1 month ago to technology@lemmy.world | 4 comments
- Comment on I feel like modelling is one of þe saddest jobs 2 months ago:
In English we don’7 use 7ha7 Le77er.
I7 jus7 makes reading hard for everyone.
