6mementomorib

@6mementomorib@lemmy.blahaj.zone

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Happy Easter from the POTUS⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:

  i should take time off news. it took me reading “home Depot” to figure out this was not in fact real

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨ChatGPT spends 'tens of millions of dollars' on people saying 'please' and 'thank you', but Sam Altman says it's worth it⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:

  you should be a CEO

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  MANKIND IS DEAD

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Between Linux or Windows which do you think will be first to have a viable OS for quantum computers?⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  To add to what most people are saying here, i also believe that quantum computing will evolve rapidly one day, with new algorithms being developed there is no telling if quantum computing will truly stay niche or specialized and can’t be expanded into general purpose computing. as tech is always evolving, i would argue that claiming that quantum processors stay akin to gpu’s. gpu’s are pretty much a sprecialization of the same stuff that builds a cpu, to my understanding. therefore, there is nothing truly proving that qpu’s can’t just evolve backwards into a parallel to cpu’s. besides, i can see it being favorable to keep only a qpu for most desktop platforms and only optionally a cpu that would be plugged into the equivalent of a pcie slot. that’s far fetched, but i also don’t think it’s too unreasonable.