felsiq
@felsiq@lemmy.zip
- Comment on Guerrilla Women 5 days ago:
Hetero?
- Comment on My blog now has Lemmy comments 4 weeks ago:
I’m a little bit biased here but it might be a good idea to use an instance like lemmy.zip instead, to minimize the amount of defederation going on.
- Comment on Why Choose? 4 weeks ago:
Probably defederated from lemmynsfw, which is the bulk of it that I see
- Comment on risky abbreviations 5 weeks ago:
Shame they changed it, I think it was kinda cute Microsoft named it after their execs
- Comment on You know who 1 month ago:
It’s more getting chopped in the ankles than running over feet ime (still shouldn’t be common, but kids are dumb)
- Comment on Couple tried to sell baby for a 6-pack of beer and $1,000 at campground, police say 1 month ago:
That’s what I want to believe, but the beer doesn’t really fit my mental image of that situation lol
- Comment on Couple tried to sell baby for a 6-pack of beer and $1,000 at campground, police say 1 month ago:
I don’t know if I’m more concerned about the couple selling, or whoever’s buying
- Comment on The mark 1 month ago:
ITT: .world’s image hosting costs are doubled
- Comment on Picture 2 months ago:
Yep, not implying it is - like I said, just taking the point to a logical extreme where (ideally) everyone would agree that at least some speech can’t be allowed with no repercussions. I’m curious where along the spectrum of fucked up things to say you’d personally draw the line - were you focusing on the distinction between nazi shit/gore and a direct threat because you’d consider either/both allowable, or just wanting to point out a false dichotomy?
- Comment on Do lesbians like boobs as much as straight guys? 2 months ago:
Yeah nah gay guy here to ruin your theory - I’ve got absolutely no attraction to boobs and/or feminine asses. I’m sure some tendency towards bisexuality is more common than strict homo/hetero-sexuality, but I strongly doubt I’m alone in this either.
- Comment on Picture 2 months ago:
I can see what you’re saying in the sense that nothing should physically be stopping them from saying it, but also nothing should be insulating them from the consequences of what they say, right? To take it to a logical extreme, if a kid says they’re going to shoot up the school the next day, I hope we can agree that requires more from school admins than just “well, it’s his right to say that”.
I personally also think it’s stupid for a school to be involved for a shirt like in the OP (western society is much too puritanical about simple nudity/body parts, imo), but there’s clearly a line somewhere about what speech/expression can be allowed in public. Assuming you can agree with that, where would you want that line to be? I’d personally draw the line before it reaches threats to peoples’ physical/mental health (like the nazis and gore I mentioned). - Comment on Picture 2 months ago:
Out of curiosity, would you say the same applies to putting nazi propaganda or violent gore on a shirt and wearing it in a school?