graphite
@graphite@lemmy.world
- Comment on AI System Detects Social Norm Violations 1 year ago:
but if it starts to be used to censor information and rate humans, that’s the line.
That line has already been crossed. Since it’s already been crossed, it’s inevitable that this will be used in that way.
- Comment on Computer chip with built-in human brain tissue gets military funding 1 year ago:
Or something out of a David Cronenberg movie
- Comment on How do I prevent hackers from stealing my debit card information? 1 year ago:
Running a virus scan wouldn’t be enough
No, those can be bypassed. If your kernel is what’s infected, then it’s not going to find anything.
Scanners are useful, but what they can look for is limited.
- Comment on 'FUCK SPEZ': Reddit Users Unite to Turn r/Place Mural Into a Protest 1 year ago:
public image is important in the long term, and he completely ruined that.
It’s not important if the shareholders can net a specific amount in the short term that makes them happy.
He would have made far more by preserving it.
Well, that’s the thing. I’m saying as long as he meets a threshold that makes the shareholders/investors happy, then he’s competent.
Besides, the “public image” of the website has always been mediocre.
- Comment on 'FUCK SPEZ': Reddit Users Unite to Turn r/Place Mural Into a Protest 1 year ago:
Where is the incompetence? His competency is dependent on making money for a specific few.
It has nothing to do with the outcome of the site, beyond how that outcome influences said making of money.
If the shareholders cash out happy and the site dies out, he did his job, regardless of whether or not you think that’s fair.
Yes, it sucks for the rest of us who liked Reddit. I am one of those people.
Saying this guy is incompetent just because his interests go against the interests of people who use Reddit is ludicrous.
The interests are in conflict, it sucks. That’s it.
- Comment on TSMC delays US chip fab opening, says US talent is insufficient 1 year ago:
“nuh-uh-uh, you didn’t raise my pay”
- Comment on James Cameron on AI: "I warned you guys in 1984 and you didn't listen" 1 year ago:
Sure, but you can definitely guage the level of popularity of one take over another.
At that point, the one which dominates is obviously going to be the one holds the status quo
- Comment on James Cameron on AI: "I warned you guys in 1984 and you didn't listen" 1 year ago:
Plenty of people have told “original” stories.
Stories that are popular can be legal rip offs from something that is vaguely similar but never gained much exposure. So, what?
“I told a story that the world is familiar with and has sufficient relevance to the issues of today but nobody heeded the warning”
“uhh, yeah, but it wasn’t original”
My remark was self indulgent and totally as[s]inine, but I’m just saying something too, where’s my pass?
Sorry, I guess you probably have made a significant contribution that’s relevant to this glaring issue in society that we’re all trying to come to grips with?
The internet doesn’t act as a single cohesive entity
No, but a significant portion of it does act as a single, cohesive entity. Enough to perpetuate memes into popularity that glorify one and simultaneously villify another.
That’s self evident.
- Comment on James Cameron on AI: "I warned you guys in 1984 and you didn't listen" 1 year ago:
No one has told an “original” story.
It’s a self indulgent and totally assinine remark but at least he’s saying something.