Goodman
@Goodman@discuss.tchncs.de
- Comment on Large-scale online deanonymization with LLMs 2 weeks ago:
no thank you, offer is appreciated though 🙏
- Comment on Large-scale online deanonymization with LLMs 2 weeks ago:
You have a lot say on this. Its good that someone thinks about these thing. I’m sorry that I can’t really provide you with a good discussion. I don’t know enough about markets etc and I don’t want to spend too long online.
I agree that can’t really stamp out openness and anonymity online (which is beautiful in a way) but I think that will mostly be reserved to technically capable users in the cracks and niches of the web who can navigate the restrictions. This is a massive tragedy.
This brings us to the current state of the web with age restrictions popping up everywhere, deanonimization etc. I think that we are in agreement regarding where it is going. Where you think we should be heading. I’m sure you have opinios on that
- Comment on Large-scale online deanonymization with LLMs 2 weeks ago:
I read one of your blog posts about empathy this mornjng. It resonated with me and my recent views on the world.
- Comment on Large-scale online deanonymization with LLMs 2 weeks ago:
Thanks for explaining your thoughts. So to paraphrase you: you are saying that the market and by proxy, nations too, Are still adapting to the concept of the internet. One way to cope with the effects is to restricted access?
- Comment on Large-scale online deanonymization with LLMs 2 weeks ago:
The internet can mostly die as far as I’m concerned. Just roll it back to file servers again, or something like gemspace. But being able to talk with people across cultures, borders freely is really important. It’s a tragedy that all these people will be hurt by the dystopification of the web. The new web needs to have a safe way to converse socially that is safe and easy enough to use for lay people. I have so much more to say on this, but real life is calling so I’ll leave it at this.
I don’t really get your point about markets though. I’m genuinely trying to understand, so bear with me. This is what I got from your post:
Our market has coexisted with an extremely fast global communication network for decades now. Given that the market feels like a quite organic thing, on what authority is the market not meant to coexists with the internet?
I think that internet access is restricted because of technological constraints, a technological lag in rolling out higher speed infrastructure, and a the lack of demand for that access which is driven by technological and practical constraint. Some complex function of those factors haha. Still, I don’t really know what you are trying to get across.
- Comment on Large-scale online deanonymization with LLMs 2 weeks ago:
It took me an embarrassingly long to get the joke. I forgot what the original thread was.
- Comment on Large-scale online deanonymization with LLMs 3 weeks ago:
Everyday the internet gets a little worse. I hate it here in this technological hellscape. I have more to say, but this bullshit makes me so so tired. Goodnight.
- Comment on Child’s Play: Tech’s new generation and the end of thinking 3 weeks ago:
After contemplating on this: These companies that seek to eliminate thinking, spit in the face of agency. They call themselves agentic yet seek seek to kill all agency and authenticity in the users of their products which is contemptible enough.
We should all be more like Donald Boat.
If we can’t change the material conditions that let these losers play with money and toys then we can at least hold them in cultural contempt.
- Comment on Child’s Play: Tech’s new generation and the end of thinking 3 weeks ago:
A bit long, but well written. It read like a novel, quite enjoyable.
What a fucking world
A world of non-thinkers
At least Donald Boat found some wisdom.
- Comment on cant take it anymore 4 weeks ago:
You are right my friend. But i’m afraid that this might be at odds with annonimity online. These micro communities might look a lot like this, just more restrictive on the user registration side.
I can imagine that we may have a federated community of human verified forums. Where you have to go to the computer club at least once to get a forum account.
Anyways, the death of online truth and authenticity gives us a tremendous opportunity to reinvent what online contact should look like. But inevitably, it will be more outside and less online I think.
- Comment on cant take it anymore 4 weeks ago:
Yes it sort of feels like online ecosystem collapse. Between all the insincerity, ads and slop. Very few online places feel alive :(
- Comment on cant take it anymore 4 weeks ago:
Yes AI is utter shite at poetry. Its the only proof of humanity I can convey over text except for swearing to show that I’m not a sterile soulless corporate autocomplete taking the space of valuable human interaction.
- Comment on cant take it anymore 4 weeks ago:
Glad to be here, witnessing the death of the internet as we know it here with you all. I’m pretty sure most of you are real so let’s enjoy the show together before we all go outside again!
As the internet lay dying I wondered if I should be crying A great gift to mankind is losing it’s mind
Should we should stay? Say the friends we made along the way
Who are we without web? But who, is the web without the we?
Even as we grief and leave
Remember.
There is no web without the we And where we go the web will be
- Comment on Claude Code is suddenly everywhere inside Microsoft 1 month ago:
Microslop cope-pilot
- Comment on We gotta be more encouraging 4 months ago:
And go on the Joe Organ podcast ofc
- Comment on Why are people using the "þ" character? 4 months ago:
I have seen some others, but I checked the account and they haven’t posted for a year or so. Seems like they quit after they started using alternate characters.
- Comment on Why are people using the "þ" character? 4 months ago:
I know it’s a little crazy to me. I know of at least one guy who quit the platform after he started experimenting with alternate characters as an armchair linguist, because of the hate they were getting. Can’t people have their fun or be different? Do you also go crazy if someone makes a spelling mistake or if you see a ßöøê character? In get the misinformation part for the other person, but I still think some of you are overreacting.
- Comment on [deleted] 5 months ago:
I don’t quite get your question, but It’s not bullshit, I believe that the terms were first coined by Marx (if memory serves). The base superstucture model is just a model by which to view the world, in that it explains (to some degree) how sociocultural/economic and other phenomenon arise from the means and relations of production, which is definitely true to some extent. But no model is perfect and it’s not the only model. The world is pretty complex and people can and do take actions that defy this model.
- Comment on Step 1: Delete 6 months ago:
Thanks for taking the time to respond, but that sounds genuinely aweful. I’ve had these treats for my cat as well, but I didn’t realize that they could be that addictive.
- Comment on Step 1: Delete 6 months ago:
Can you elaborate?
- Comment on House Republicans Investigate Wikipedia Over Alleged Bias 6 months ago:
Right and we also use lemmy, but we still weigh and judge what we read here or at least we should. And we should do the same for Wikipedia, even though I would argue that Wikipedia has higher epistemic standards than Lemmy. The point being, the openness of these platforms is a quality on its own. Wikipedia isn’t perfect, but it is far from terrible.
- Comment on House Republicans Investigate Wikipedia Over Alleged Bias 6 months ago:
It’s true that it is not generally accepted for writing a paper or essay, but that does not mean that the information is completely unreliable. While I’m sure that Wikipedia is not perfect with regards to truth, it is more accessible, democratized and readable than many primary sources or peer reviewed articles. Those properties have a lot of value by themselves. Would you not agree?
- Comment on Jump on in. 6 months ago:
Oldy goldy for those who don’t know the video m.youtube.com/watch?v=PHSJCMkUa9Y
- Comment on Zotero is still better. 6 months ago:
I might misunderstand, but isn’t that just a format? How do you manage and organize with Bibtex like in Zotero?
- Comment on Enlightenment 7 months ago:
luckily it’s a shitpost and not a correctpost
- Submitted 7 months ago to [deleted] | 19 comments
- Comment on Will Chat Control affect P2P apps such as Briar? 7 months ago:
Thank you for replying
- Comment on Will Chat Control affect P2P apps such as Briar? 7 months ago:
Elborate?
- Comment on Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task 8 months ago:
What’s wrong with EEG?
- Comment on Lara Croft games are the nightmare of any real archaeologist, biologist and paleontologist. 9 months ago:
Schlieman moment
