unautrenom
@unautrenom@jlai.lu
- Comment on Court Orders Google (a Monopolist) To Knock It Off With the Monopoly Stuff. 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on NCSoft president: "The games industry's evolution towards acceptance and diversity is ongoing" 3 months ago:
I feel like that’s just a very loud minority among those who play games. As you’ve so stated, the majority of people who play these games either do not care for politics in video games, and another subset prefer it that way.
If even the greediest of companies in the video game industry keep doing that, that means they’ve analyzed the market and having politics in video games might have between no to a positive impact on sales.
- Comment on Mozilla roll out first AI features in Firefox Nightly 4 months ago:
AI may have its uses, but the easy counterpoint to your argument is to look at FTX at its peak and where it is now (bankrupt). The stock exchange is the exact opposite of rational, and is terrible at estimating the use one can get out of tech.
- Comment on "I lost trust": Why the OpenAI team in charge of safeguarding humanity imploded 5 months ago:
idk most politicians are a threat to the environement like AI (if not even more so with their moronic laws)
- Comment on We have to stop ignoring AI’s hallucination problem 5 months ago:
More or less, yes.
- Comment on Microsoft is testing Game Pass ads on the Windows 11 Settings homepage 5 months ago:
To my knowledge, this hasn’t been the case for nearly a decade, after the backlash they received specifically for it.
- Comment on "No, seriously. All those things Google couldn't find anymore? Top of the search pile. Queries that generated pages of spam in Google results? Fucking pristine on Kagi – the right answers, over and ov 7 months ago:
Expose your subdomains as in having all of them bundled into one certificate?
AFAIK, you absolutely can request different certs for each subdomain (in fact, that’s what I’ve been doing for a while).
- Comment on Apple will allow users to download apps directly from a developer’s website, in latest EU App Store rule change 8 months ago:
Well, in this case of 1 000 000 downloads, that would make a 50 000 dollar difference. Not really something ‘little’.
- Comment on 🚨SIGNIFICANT, POSITIVE ANNOUNCEMENT ALERT🚨The European Mathmatical Society working with research libraries have found a way to make ALL of the research journals they publish open access, with no APC 9 months ago:
That’s great news! Always hated those paywalled research papers and greedy publishers who get away with freaking 100% royalty. Hopefully other organisations will follow.
- Comment on Xbox Player Gets Banned for 1 Year After Recording Baldur's Gate 3 Scenes 10 months ago:
In which case the ban should have happened upon sharing not recording. I mean if it isn’t clear that the records you make of singleplayer offline games are published online, then banning someone for what they record feels more like moral policing than anything else tbh.
- Comment on AI-created “virtual influencers” are stealing business from humans 10 months ago:
(tbf that’s not a really high bar. These companies ask writters to NOT take any risk with their writing so to not “rock the boat” so to speak)
- Comment on EU Article 45 requires that browsers trust certificate authorities appointed by governments 1 year ago:
The only mitm that can be done is at the server itself or in a website pretending to be the requested server. But for this to work, you need to have the private and public keys of the server you want to act like.
Maybe I misunderstand what you’re saying, but since the wide majority of EU citizens use their ISP’s DNS, it’s trivial for them to mandate a domain redirection to another server which would act as a proxy of the original (and thus only need the original server’s public key).
So far, the only protection we have against that are:
- Changing DNS (WAY too complicated for the average user, also brings the DNS’ own contry’s censorship)
- The fact that they wouldn’t have a valid certificate for it because any sensible CA would see it for what it is: a MITM.
That’s why, to my understanding, this is such a big deal. At any point, ANY EU gov (and I want to emphasis that part because ot’s important in the context of tjhs law) can request a change of DNS from their ISP’s DNS (many already do right now) and emit a fully trusted certificate for the domain they want to MITM.
- Comment on Your Windows 10 PC will soon be 'junk' - users told to resist Microsoft deadline 1 year ago:
… until the EU and maybe even the US rolls around and slaps Microsoft with an antitrust lawsuit. Sounds like a best case scenario :D