Did Europeans intentionally infect North American Natives with smallpox/disease?

Submitted ⁨⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨rab@lemmy.ca⁩ to ⁨history@lemmy.world⁩

haidagwaiipledge.ca/…/Final-Draft-HG-Visitor-Orie…

I’m reading the haida gwaii visitor orientation, under section 2.b.i., Disease and Decimation

“Our oral records of the intentional introduction of smallpox have been reaffirmed in Tom Swankey’s recent publications, including work that has been vetted by the Haida Nation. Through evidence found in captains’ logs and journals of government officials such as Francis Poole and James Douglas, this disease outbreak has been confirmed as an act of biological warfare.”

My understanding was always that back then, disease wasn’t well understood, and that the first european explorers especially to haida gwaii did not realize they carried disease and by the time they made contact it the damage was already done. Both parties were merely interested in trading, and disease inadvertently spread, at least that is what I thought.

Can any experts here weigh in?

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
It’s at least plausible. A decade before Haida Gwaii was first seen by European explorers there was the 1763 Siege of Fort Pitt. During the siege the British famously attempted to infect the natives with smallpox by giving them blankets that had been used by smallpox patients. Whether it worked or not is a subject of debate, but the Europeans clearly had the idea that they could intentionally spread a disease to harm a population.

source
- HubertManne@kbin.social ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  yeah seems like pasteur just solidified germs as the source sorta like with atoms and dna and such. the ideas were there but not fleshed out. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germ_theory_of_disease#The_Middle_Ages
  
  source
spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I don’t know where yall are from but my schooling in Canada taught this as fact. I don’t recall specifics since it was so long ago so I have nothing to back that claim up.

I was unaware that this was not a known thing. Indigenous Americans were treated abysmal by the people who invaded and stole their land.

source
- rab@lemmy.ca ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  I’m Canadian too and of course natives were treated deplorably, that’s no secret
  
  I am just skeptical that early explorers would be hellbent on spreading disease, when their priorities were to map the globe and bring home pelts
  
  source
dilithium_dame@startrek.website ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I won’t count myself as an expert, so feel free to skip this post if it isn’t helpful. My background is in U.S. history. I can’t speak to Canadian or British documentation.

Oral history and written history are two different matters and people will weigh them differently. I have not read Mr. Swankey’s work, but I would want to know more about what kind of “vetting” the Haida did before I can judge the impartiality of the work.

According to a U.S. history professor I worked with who was trying to trace primary sources for this aspect of history on the U.S. side, he believed this claim originated from a passing mention in a letter written by a British officer (I’m sorry, it was so long ago I can’t remember the officer’s name and date of the letter, and I don’t want to dox my coworker since his professional opinion may be unpopular).

He had been unable to find any further follow up in the written record, specifically in relation to any official U.S. government policy or general implementation of such a strategy. This was some years ago so I am unaware if his research produced any more primary sources. Thus far the letter he read has been the only direct primary source I’ve seen in it’s entirety. Like you, I have come up short when trying to locate documentation. The Wikipedia (yes, I know) page for smallpox lists several sources under the “biological warfare” section related to what is written there and it could be interesting to look into those publications.

I also have had questions about how people understood disease at this time, and how would they determine the unlucky guy who would get to “gift” infected goods and potentially be infected himself. I have to wonder how this was supposed to work logistically based on their (lack of) understanding of viruses. Maybe I’m over complicating this, but I would not be eager to mess around with anything from a smallpox victim any more than necessary.

This is a difficult subject to examine though and find the actual facts, both because of how long ago this was, and because of the emotional aspect. I still remember a (different) professor I had in college when I was studying for my bachelor’s in history who was giddy about how many white people had died from tobacco and how they deserved it and it was great the native tribes got revenge like that. I had a hard time accepting him as a (reasonably) unbiased source afterwards, though he would count as an expert.

source
badlilbean@sh.itjust.works ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
In 1796, the first vaccine was discovered and it was for smallpox. ~30 years after this stuff happened. It’s quite interesting if you’d like to do a quick read.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallpox_vaccine

source