[deleted]

Comments

• Orbituary@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  How about not use Chromium? Mozilla/Firefox browsers actually provide privacy protections. Like actually, not chrome plated promises.

  source

  • Photographer@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The biggest worry is that Chrome brings about change of websites which then requires other browsers to take on their trusted platform stuff in order to work.

    source

    • deleted@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I share the same concern. I think either Firefox will find a workaround or privacy advocates will develop open source services to act as shell to access the internet.

      I feel it’ll be the latter.

      source
    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Even if you do think it’s plausible that Google can do this in a way that can’t be beaten (at every step so far they’ve lost this war, so the odds really aren’t on their side, but let’s allow it as a possibility), this just means that we need to get more people onto non-Chromium browsers (meaning Firefox and whatever else comes along) so that it becomes infeasible to run a website that only supports chromium based browsers.

      source
• hagelslager@feddit.nl ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I know the title is clcickbait, but why RIP uBlock? There’s more than just chrome browsers.

  source

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Yep. Not one mention of firefox in the article...

    source
  • CameronDev@programming.dev ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The article even says that there is a updated ublock origin out for mv3. Its just clickbait.

    source
  • Contend6248@feddit.de ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    True, RIP chromium bozos

    source
• Reverendender@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Just gonna rep for Safari here, since it’s been ignored so far.

  source