The author’s environment Dallas jncredibly toxic. If this resonates with you, please move on. Developers don’t have to put up with this kind of crap, even in a tough economy.
Demotivating a (Skilled) Programmer
Submitted 1 year ago by Aboel3z@programming.dev to programming@programming.dev
Comments
MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Anders429@programming.dev 1 year ago
Should be titled, “demotivating a programmer with a specific personality type.” Sure, some good programmer you know doesn’t value money; that doesn’t mean every skilled programmer won’t value it.
lysdexic@programming.dev 1 year ago
Should be titled, “demotivating a programmer with a specific personality type.”
The author talks about developers who are underpaid, aren’t recognized by their work, and aren’t even supported adequately with decent gear. This doesn’t read like a list of developer traits. This reads like glorifying exploitation and terrible work conditions.
Carighan@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Apparently I’m a shit programmer.
Or maybe I’m misunderstanding the thing. If I’m unhappy, maybe paying me substantially more would make me content. Or maybe not. But more importantly, someone else offering me money to quit and join them would have me out the door so fast the chair would still be spinning.
outcide@lemmy.world 1 year ago
My experience is that people are often motivated by quite different things.
Money matters to me, but it’s not what motivates me to work. What motivates me to work is how worthwhile the work seems to me and how much I enjoy working with my colleagues. And yeah, that’s tedious, it’d be so much easier if it was all about money, but that’s not the way my brain works.
agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 1 year ago
If all of your material needs were met, would you do the exact same work you’re doing now for free?
If the answer is no, you’re working for money.
Don’t kid yourself, we’re all just hookers. We specifically have the privilege to somewhat choose which dick we have to serve, but we’re hookers still.
NoXzema@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
I think he’s just saying that working in a shit environment is sometimes more harmful than underpaying them. Pay is important but it won’t always keep someone if the job is awful.
jadero@programming.dev 1 year ago
I started and ended my working life as the proverbial blue collar worker, mostly a labourer. Programming was my hobby and I loved it. I lived and breathed and dreamt programming.
I went pro for one reason and one reason only: money. Well, okay, there was some satisfaction in helping nice people solve interesting problems, something that is rare when working as a labourer.
I knew my days were numbered when an HR goon started using transparent misinterpretations of various motivational theories to lecture me on how money really didn’t matter that much to me. She was right in the sense that prefer I time at home to getting paid time-and-a-half for overtime, even when I’m clearly underpaid, but completely out to lunch when considering my desire for hobbies and travel.
Money may not be a very good motivator, but lack of money is one hell of a demotivator!
Carighan@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That’s a good way of putting it. Thank you. :)
QuadriLiteral@programming.dev 1 year ago
I think motivation is a bit more nuanced than that. Also what is said isn’t restricted to programmers. Money is an external motivator, which means it isn’t really motivating as in providing fulfillment and energy when doing a job. It can give you a reason to to the job, “it pays the bills” or “it pays the bills extremely well”, but that’s something different.
That being said, I do look for jobs where I am motivated about the projects and the environment. In fact this is the main thing I evaluate when applying for a position. I also expect to be (and am) well-paid but I’m not aiming for the top bucks, because those jobs don’t interest me. I’m spending 8 hours a day doing this work, a big majority of the high-quality hours of the week are sunk into the job. I’m happy I get to spend them doing things I enjoy, with people I enjoy working with, as opposed to having to slog through them just because I need the money.