File Browser is being archived on 2026-09-01

Comments

• sanitation@lemmy.today ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  There is a fork though: File Browser Quantum filebrowserquantum.com

  original

  • jello@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I’ve tried to use quantum and it lost the “just works” factor that OG filebrowser has. Not sure what I’ll do now

    original

    • captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Really? I never tried the original but didn’t have much problems setting up quantum. I had to modify my caddy file somewhat to suite my needs, but just works now.

      original

      • -> View More Comments
  • TeaWithDani@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I wonder how viable it would be to do the opposite of quantum. If we remove every at risk feature and strip it down to the basics: no scripts, no multi-user, no public sharing etc…

    Project could be pretty easy to maintain indefinitely?

    original
  • irmadlad@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Thanks for that. I grinned at the pitch; 'It’s a no-compromise solution that’s a a quantum leap forward. Looking at the rest of the page, it does seem to have some bases covered with features. So, naturally, I’m going to have to check it out. Bookmarked.

    original
  • buffing_lecturer@leminal.space ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    How does this compare to copyparty?

    original
• irmadlad@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I couldn’t find any reason they’re winding down. I wonder why? Was this planned? Battlefield Fatigue? I’ve used it before, had no real complaints. It fit the use case at the time.

  original

  • u_tamtam@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    It’s there on the readme: hacdias.com/2026/07/28/filebrowser/

    The project needs a rewrite from scratch, but the author had enough.

    original

    • cenzorrll@piefed.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      File Browser would need to be rewritten from the ground up, with security and a good API in mind, neither of which was on my mind when I was 15.

      Ok, fair enough. I hope someone rewrites it, though.

      original
  • TeaWithDani@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I remember reading earlier this year that the project was essentially “complete” and would only get security updates.

    But like he says: “people keep making PRs for new features. Features that I do really think would benefit the project.”

    I really struggle with folks’ sense of gratitude sometimes. Like there’s so many people making cool things for us… for free… When they could be doing the same work for money.

    But yeah, sucks nobody could really keep the project up and secure. I’m not looking for a fork that will add anything to the project.

    I’ll read some of the bug tickets to see what the current state is like. Figured this thing could just work indefinitely without much maintenance… its so simple?

    original
  • captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    This is 100% off topic but I just realised username is ”I R mad lad” and not ”Irma Dlad”.

    original

    • irmadlad@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      That’s funny.

      original
    • rmuk@feddit.uk ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I read “I R Madlad” in the style of “I R Baboon”.

      original

      • -> View More Comments
  • Cochise@lemmy.eco.br ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    hacdias.com/2026/03/11/filebrowser/

    original

    • artyom@piefed.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      tldr lost interest

      original
• deepthinker@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  If you’re looking for a new way to manage your long term storage now that File Browser is being archived, you might want to look at huskhoard. It is an open source data tiering archive that uses fanotify to monitor your filesystem and keep your catalog in sync without heavy manual scans. I started contributing recently and I use it for my lto archive.

  original