Self Hosting Noob, Freenas vs Ubuntu Server with Samba

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨MrKilroy@lemmy.world⁩ to ⁨selfhosted@lemmy.world⁩

Hi Everyone,

So, I am very new to self-hosting. A couple of years ago I set up a mini PC running Ubuntu Server with Nextcloud and Jellyfin on my network. Now I think I want to move away from Nextcloud as for me, uploading files to it hasn’t been super reliable and it has been a little slow. It also seems to have a lot of features I really don’t need.

At the moment, I basically use my server just for file storage, plus running Jellyfin. I think initially I went to nextcloud because I wanted a solution that would automatically sync my files to my network storage kinda like onedrive. However, Nextcloud on different systems doesn’t work the same way and I basically ended up just manually copying everything over to Nextcloud and using it like a network drive. At that point, why even use nextcloud then? I would be better off with Sharing a folder using Samba right? Do you think that would be the best fit for my needs? Or should I learn about freenas? Taking a quick look at it I’m not sure what advantages it would have over just a samba share.

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
I’m not familiar with FreeNAS, but I see it’s advantages mostly in it’s gui and zfs support. So if you just need a few smb shares and don’t need to constantly configure it, I’d go with Ubuntu.

If you have multiple disks that you can use in raid, then zfs might be a good idea for it’s check summing capabilities and correction of bitrot.

But it’s also possible to install zfs on Ubuntu, though you’d have to use the cli instead of FreeNAS gui. I’ve recently setup a zfs raid 1 for the first time and the cli is simple to understand and the docs are great.

So I’d stay with Ubuntu and just use samba directly.

source
Oisteink@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
imo truenas because it’s made for storage. It will monitor your drives, it’s easy to expand storage. Want nextcloud? It’s a plugin ready to install. Want plex media server? Just add the plugin. Need backups of your machines? Try the backuppc plugin.

Core is based on frebsd, while scale is Debian. While scale is fun I’m still a core-fan.
Samba on a Debian box works as well if all you want is smb. But it’s a you made it you support it solution. On Truenas there’s loads of people making sure it’s secure and working and updating is a button.

source
CeeBee@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
FreeNAS is a deprecated version now. The successor (which is basically the same thing) is TrueNAS. They also have a version based purely on Linux called TrueNAS Scale. Both Community and Enterprise versions are available. The Community version is entirely free. It supports VMs through KVM and containerization, as well as all the network sharing options out there.

Another option is Proxmox. It’s Debian based and is more focused on virtualization than storage, but it has whatever you would really need for storage (including full ZFS support). You might find yourself in the command line for some things with Proxmox over TrueNAS, but if you were willing to go full Ubuntu I imagine that wouldn’t be an issue.

That being said, if you want to just go the manual route, then I suggest Debian. It’s leaner and considered more stable than Ubuntu, and doesn’t have some of the cruft that Ubuntu has (like Snaps), which may be a positive or a negative depending on what your needs are.

source
- zaphod@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Another vote for Debian stable. You can use Jellyfin’s repos to get an up to date version and bookworm will be solid for years which is what you want out of an appliance.
  
  source
Fermiverse@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
I use syncthing to collect my data from several devices (smartphones and PC) to my server at home, when I am in my home network.

Then, on the server, rclone takes over with various daily/weekly tasks and syncs the stuff to my cloud storage. Some encrypted some plain. From my mobile or my pc I have access to all the data either at home or via vpn as well as directly to the cloud backup.

source
Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
A lot of those points are more or less unrelated.

You can set up a samba share with a bare metal ubuntu/fedora/gentoo/whatever machine. Similarly, you can run nextcloud on whatever (I like the containerized version but…). And you can (probably) do both on a freenas box.

As for my personal setup: most of my NAS I just access via smb or scp/rsync. But for stuff that I do need synchronized, I use nextcloud… with said smb share('s directory) mounted into the container. It is far from the most secure approach (seriously, how the hell is nextcloud a commercial product when it is so feature bare and prone to breaking in containers!!!), but these are files where the goal is mostly convenience (game saves, etc) rather than privacy.

source
sv1sjp@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Well, personally I prefer the one with Enforcing Selinux by default.🐘

source
Lordjohn68@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Are you able yo host alongside freenas or on top of?

source