Are the Epstein files ever going to be released, properly?
Global powers see Wikipedia as fundamental target for manipulation— The Times says Wikipedia was "hacked" and calls it an "important victory" for Jeffrey Epstein
Submitted 16 hours ago by Beep@lemmus.org to technology@lemmy.world
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2026-02-17/In_the_media
Comments
WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 15 hours ago
thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 14 hours ago
I assume that was a rhetorical question ?
If not: They document illegal behaviour by billionaires. Of course not.
They only way they get fully released is if the US has a revolution and uses the ancient French solution on the 1%
queermunist@lemmy.ml 12 hours ago
🎵 It should also be noted a bottle of it was found
In the clenched dead hand of the white John Brown
Everytime it went 'round new people would find it
They would take their essence, put it in and grind it
In Russia, Africa, Asia too
Mao Tse-Tung made the flavors new 🎶
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
I don’t want to distract from the article itself, but on a generic level, The Signpost is worth reading for anyone interested in the “behind-the-scenes” of the project. They published another article about this a couple weeks ago.
chromodynamic@piefed.social 14 hours ago
Using Kiwix you can keep older versions of Wikipedia locally on your computer, so if the online version reaches an unusable state, you can still view the articles as they used to be. Of course, it won’t have information about anything that happened after that point, but it could still be useful for some purposes.
LucidNightmare@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 hours ago
Exactly the reason I set up mine. Couldn’t be more important at this time!