As an AI Luddite, I’m not sure how I feel about this.
Great finally having a counter weight to llm’s trained on the massive free market propaganda dataset. We just need to move past these archaic ‘*isms’ that are hardly scientific at all.
Socialist AI
Submitted 6 days ago by Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml to technology@lemmy.zip
Comments
Sims@lemmy.ml 4 days ago
lvxferre@mander.xyz 4 days ago
The 'isms are better thought as points of reference for your political views; for example someone saying “I’m an
$personist” is basically saying “I agree with what$personsaid/did in most theoretical and practical matters”. They are useful, specially as they help you to understand what the other person defends, e.g.- a Maoist is likely to put heavy emphasis on rural workers
- a Trotskyist is likely to believe the revolution should give no fucks about borders
- a Dengist is likely to downplay the differences between market vs. state-planned economies, seeing them as just tools for an end
- a Luxemburgist is likely to raise criticism against any “higher” role of a vanguard; etc.
So they aren’t problematic on themselves. You need to watch out for dogmatism, though; just because you’re a
$personist doesn’t mean you should automatically clap to every single thing$persondid or said.
Sxan@piefed.zip 5 days ago
An echo chamber is an echo chamber. Noþing healþy comes from it.
lvxferre@mander.xyz 5 days ago
I’m no Luddite when it comes to AI but I dunno how to feel about this either.
Those bots are not a good way to inform yourself. They’re a bit too prone to say inane shit while vomiting certainty, they convey the undeclared political bias of the data set, and even when they’re right they’re simply not cost-efficient regarding water/energy consumption. I think a good FAQ system addressing newbie questions would be better, beyond that referring them directly to the literature.
Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml 5 days ago
I think they are pretty clear about their political bias and the direction. Like any tool, I guess it can be a good reference source or a total garbage can, depending on how it is administered. I’m still sticking with reading printed material, so its definitely not for me; maybe the younger set.
lvxferre@mander.xyz 4 days ago
Ah, that’s actually good. I don’t mind some bias (I’m sceptic on sources claiming to be “unbiased”), but I want it to be as explicit as possible.
I just tested it and confirmed what you said, by asking “What’s the role of peasants in revolutionary processes?”. The answer quoted Trotsky almost exclusively; that works like a charm for me (I’m mostly Trotskyist), but a Maoist would already scream bloody murder.