You’re processing methane into just hydrogen and pure carbon
That’s interesting because carbon is a solid, not a greenhouse gas. If this process scales up, I wonder what we would do with vast quantities of carbon? In the worst case we could bury it, like a reverse coal mine.
SIGSEGV@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Neat! I’d like to know more, like how efficient it is to create hydrogen this way, or how long it takes compared to conventional methods.
schroedingershat@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Thermodynamically you start with ~55MJ/kg available if you were to oxidise the methane.
Then you end with 750g of carbon that would give you ~35MJ/kg were you to oxidise it or 26MJ. And 250g of hydrogen that would give you 120MJ/kg or 30MJ
If it were 100% efficient and free then for the cost of the input methane you could get the same amount of thermal energy with a solar panel or wind turbine and a resistor.
As far as ways of greenwashing fossil methane go, it might actually have some potential positive effect, although the hydrogen produced will not be competitive except as backup energy.
As a thing to do with waste-emission methane it might be better than burning it. You’d still need some way of storing the hydrogen that is competitive with overbuilding solar + 4-12hr batteries (none presently exists).
SIGSEGV@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Thanks!