Submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@lemmy.zip to technology@lemmy.zip
https://www.pcmag.com/news/the-truth-is-paywalled-internet-vets-lament-the-state-of-the-open-web
In discussing where we went wrong, a panel of luminaries, including Vint Cerf and the Internet Archive’s Brewster Kahle, sees three Cs: centralization, copyright, and competition.
The argument that paywalls somehow ruin the open parts of the Web always fell flat for me. It is trivial to contribute to the Web for free if one wishes. Nobody is forced to paywall their content.
Yeah the implicit argument, to me at least, was that all journalism should be free. Which, sure but that’s a way larger discussion than just the internet. We’d need radically new funding models etc.
It used to be if you wanted the detailed news you had to pay for it, either a subscription or 25¢ for that day’s edition ($1 on Sunday). But it was really easy to get that day’s edition: just stick a quarter in the dispenser.
We need to find a way to make that work. I wouldn’t mind paying 50¢ or $1 for access to one day’s-worth of articles, but the payment processing fees eat away all the money on such small transactions. I also don’t necessarily want to set up an account for some random local newspaper on the other side of the country that I’m looking at this one time and might never look at again. It feels like these should be solvable problems, though.
Yeah exactly, well said. I think for a lot of people the advent of paywalls felt like taking away a free thing, instead of a return to the norm. Personally when it comes to journalism I prefer a paywall to advertiser-supported.
An interesting but frustrating read. I agree with the complaints, but lament the lack of concrete plans to fix any of it. One wonders if we’re all waiting for someone else to create the vision.
Hopefully the future of the internet is better than the past or present
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Communities like lemmy can make a big difference against this as an issue by building up community rules and norms to not support paywalled/ adwalled content.
There are alternatives, they just aren’t the ones which most people post. Support alternatives and we as a community can break through this issue.
Septimaeus@infosec.pub 7 hours ago
Agree. To take some burden off contributors, maybe we could automate some of that?
Most of us have seen bots used for routine post processing like:
We wouldn’t necessarily need traditional bot comments since our software is open. Content helpers could run during post creation, for example. My point is just that there’s existing logic for this kind of stuff.