[deleted]

Comments

• bpalmerau@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Get out your black paint, change ‘TO’ to ‘HOLE’. Job done. More speech, not censorship, right?

  source
• jaek@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Genuine question: how is this anti-Semitic?

  source

  • Eyekaytee@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    [deleted]

    source

    • eureka@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      They weren’t attacked because some of them were Jewish. That’s coincidental. We don’t go around saying Normandy D-Day was anti-German sentiment, or that the Allied Kokoda Trail campaign was an anti-Asian project. It’s an attack against settlers occupying territory. If you have a problem with that or how it was done, then that’s valid, but to consider it antisemitic is mischaracterising it completely.

      A big part of the Zionist Regime’s propaganda (for many decades) is to try and conflate Jewishness with their ethnostate, and to label critisism of their state policy as antisemitic, even when voiced by Jewish people. Is it antisemitic of my Jewish friends who call for the fall of the Zionist Regime? Are the Jews Against the Occupation '48 group here an antisemitic organisation? Are the orthodox rabbis who’ve burnt Israel flags antisemitic? If you ask the Zionists, “yes!”, they arrogantly claim to be the one true voice of Jewish people.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • jaek@aussie.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      It’s not wishing massacres on Jewish people, it’s wishing for armed resistance against the Israeli occupying forces, who are currently in the process of committing a genocide against the Palestinians.

      If you saw graffiti which said “up the RA” would you call it “anti-protestant”?

      Another important thing to note is that it’s likely that many of these victims were actually killed by IDF forces as part of their “Hannibal Directive”.

      Heres a good article about it:

      web.archive.org/web/20240909021335/…/104224430

      source