Most people think that in three dimensions the number 1 looks like the incorrect version drawn on the bottom right.
In fact it has been proven that the number 1 in 3d actually has a square base that extends in two dimensions from the stem of the 1.
Submitted 4 days ago by supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
Most people think that in three dimensions the number 1 looks like the incorrect version drawn on the bottom right.
In fact it has been proven that the number 1 in 3d actually has a square base that extends in two dimensions from the stem of the 1.
Fun fact: this also applies to the fourth spatial dimension. If you take a 3D “slice” of the 4D point where the base meets the stem, the resulting 3D form will be a cube.
Also, the descender is actually a cone revolving around the W axis.
Is there a reference for this?
No, this is from my research notes I wrote myself.
42?
Zerush@lemmy.ml 4 days ago
Worse with the 2
sketchtoy.com/71426243