This is really big imo.
You shouldn’t expect full interoperability with this alone! At most, you should expect that your public posts get shared with your followers on Mastodon (i.e. an outbox)
:fart noises:
Pull request to begin to add ActivityPub support to the bluesly PDS
Submitted 3 weeks ago by irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com to fediverse@lemmy.world
https://github.com/bluesky-social/atproto/pull/3943
Comments
Ulrich@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
Watch then deny it cos it will threaten their market capture lol
OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
They’ll say something like “can’t handle the scale”
flamingos@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Really cool honestly. How big it is is probably predicated on if Bluesky enabled it for PDS’es on bsky.social.
Olap@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
This is big. Bluesky is getting lots of traction with normies who want off Twitter. Mastodon and pleroma and pixelfed all about to become much more discoverable
skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 3 weeks ago
We pretty much had this when the first reliable Mastodon<->Bluesky bridge came online. The Fediverse side protested and made the entire system opt-in.
When this goes live, I expect people to treat it the same as every other sizeable social media joining the Fediverse, with outrange and block lists.
tonytins@pawb.social 3 weeks ago
I dunno. I still posts from the Bluesky bridge getting boosts. This might not be as bad Threads.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Why would they protest and make it opt in? The whole point of the fediverse is that your posts are completely public. Literally anyone and anything can scrape it, your server would hand it to them on a silver platter. That’s the point.
haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 3 weeks ago
Exactly. It is a huge, authoritarian, corporate platform that can absolutely ruin the fedi if it ever turns against us (think ads, bad moderation, nudging campaigns, etc).
Its not at all as black and white as threads is but it is still a huge problem.