Pull request to begin to add ActivityPub support to the bluesly PDS

Comments

• Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  You shouldn’t expect full interoperability with this alone! At most, you should expect that your public posts get shared with your followers on Mastodon (i.e. an outbox)

  :fart noises:

  source
• muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Watch then deny it cos it will threaten their market capture lol

  source

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    They’ll say something like “can’t handle the scale”

    source
• flamingos@feddit.uk ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Really cool honestly. How big it is is probably predicated on if Bluesky enabled it for PDS’es on bsky.social.

  source
• Olap@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  This is big. Bluesky is getting lots of traction with normies who want off Twitter. Mastodon and pleroma and pixelfed all about to become much more discoverable

  source

  • skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    [deleted]

    source

    • haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Exactly. It is a huge, authoritarian, corporate platform that can absolutely ruin the fedi if it ever turns against us (think ads, bad moderation, nudging campaigns, etc).

      Its not at all as black and white as threads is but it is still a huge problem.

      source
    • Flax_vert@feddit.uk ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Why would they protest and make it opt in? The whole point of the fediverse is that your posts are completely public. Literally anyone and anything can scrape it, your server would hand it to them on a silver platter. That’s the point.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • tonytins@pawb.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I dunno. I still posts from the Bluesky bridge getting boosts. This might not be as bad Threads.

      source