The paper, due to be voted on tomorrow (20 May), means Labour will ban trans women from:
❌ All-women shortlists ❌ Women’s Conference ❌ Being Women’s Officers
Any Labour MP that doesn’t rebel against this is complicit.
Submitted 2 days ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
https://bsky.app/profile/leftiestats.bsky.social/post/3lpjw66sy722t
The paper, due to be voted on tomorrow (20 May), means Labour will ban trans women from:
❌ All-women shortlists ❌ Women’s Conference ❌ Being Women’s Officers
Any Labour MP that doesn’t rebel against this is complicit.
And I’m never voting Labour again. You mother fuckers
That’s fine if there is a viable alternative in your district. If none of them align with this one stance then it’s basically a non-issue.
What next, Labour? Reintroduce Section 28?
FFS
flamingos@feddit.uk 2 days ago
Reminder, the SC didn’t rule that trans people had to be excluded from gender segregated things, only that they could. Labour doesn’t have to do this, they’re choosing to, and even if they did, they’re the fucking government. What is the point of an elective dictatorship if the party of government is going to be so unwilling to actually change anything?