See also: www.buildaballot.org.au
The questions there are a little biased but the results were generally in line with how I’d vote.
Submitted 1 week ago by vividspecter@lemm.ee to australia@aussie.zone
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXHq04W0kBs
See also: www.buildaballot.org.au
The questions there are a little biased but the results were generally in line with how I’d vote.
I can’t seem to make it past select electorate page. Nothing is selectable.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)
The Juice Media are forever questionable to me for recommending the teals as a blanket “not shit candidates”, despite some of them, not unsurprisingly, being against workers rights.
sqgl@beehaw.org 1 week ago
Really? My leftie friend got recommended Trumpet of Patriots. I can’t be bothered trying it myself.
So I suspect it is a site owned by Palmer which recommends him randomly for users (randomly to evade easy replication to prove it).
vividspecter@lemm.ee 1 week ago
Interesting, which electorate? I redid the survey and got the same results (could be consistent with IP).
It’s possible to match with Palmer just because he’s throwing out a bunch of policies that might sound good but have no logical consistency or anything backing it. Probably the survey should account for that if it isn’t already.
In any case, you can select your own preferences and build your own paper, which is the main reason I posted it.
sqgl@beehaw.org 1 week ago
My friend repeated the process and this time got a sensible result (ToP were suggested last).
He confesses that what may have happened the first time is that, because ToP have scored the top position on the lower house ballot in his electorate, he might have kneejerk reacted to the order of appearance rather than suggested numbering.
sqgl@beehaw.org 1 week ago
Parramatta
sqgl@beehaw.org 1 week ago
Hmmm. Whois says a climate activist has registered the domain. Doesn’t add up. Still leaving my comment in case others experience similar.