This argument in this article is poor. An analogy would be:
“Because donating free food to the poor might feed future criminals, we should no longer provide free food.”
On Evils in Software Licensing
Submitted 4 days ago by chobeat@lemmy.ml to technology@lemmy.world
https://lgug2z.com/articles/on-evils-in-software-licensing/
toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
“We know that there is a clear relationship between corporations which expend focused energy explicitly and implicitly promoting the use of Open Source Initiative-approved licenses to independent developers, and the genocide being committed in Palestine.”
“The Freedom to refuse”
This article is bonkers. It manages to twist the Free Software Movement, that I would argue is intrinsically radically anti-capitalist, to be somehow pro capitalist, because free labour. Completely ignoring the whole mutual benefit and means of production held in common part of the deal. It tries to paint restricions of who is allowed to use the software (breaking F(L)OSS definitions) as a “Freedom”, the freedom to “refuse”. Actual use of Orwellian phrasing there. And then somehow: Open source = Siding against Palestine.
freeman@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
This is the most ridiculous part, if they ever try to enforce the license against someone the definition of evil is going to be decided by a court. In that context a humanitarian organization using your software to help Palestinians is more likely to be condemned than a military contractor that kills Palestinians.
chobeat@lemmy.ml 4 days ago
the article doesn’t mention the Free Software Movement even once.
toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
The article doesnt use the wording “Free Software Movement” it uses “open source licensing proponents” which includes the Free Software Movement.
As for the genocide per default part: Its nonsense to believe that if open source didnt exist or was different that it would somehow lead to less genocide.