What are some examples of original fediverse software, not emulating existing platforms?

Comments

• nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Misskey. It’s second most used software in fediverse. Used in misskey.io, which has 10 thousands daily active user (possibly 100K-200K MAU).

  Developed since 2014. Originally function as self-hosted microblogging, now turns into unique social media. For example:

  • Misskey-flavoured Markdown, example
  • social games (only two so far: Reversi and Bubble Game)
  • emoji reaction like Discord (they’re the first one to implement it on fediverse)
  • Antennas (tracking post with any keyword)
  • Pages
  • Channels (groups)
  • Clips (bookmark with multiple groups, kinda like Facebook bookmarks)
  • Achievement
  • optional ads banner (just in case the server admin wants to do community ads, usually used for indie games, comics, vtuber, or IRL art event)

  Their community is mainly Japanese, they desperately need English contributor and community to help them grow.

  source

  • Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The UI of misskey + forks is so gorgeous. If I enjoyed using social media, I’d definitely use it.

    source
  • yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The Misskey forks are in English, the only bad thing is that they are a little resource intensive

    source

    • nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      If it was soft-fork, than its fine. Almost all previous forks are hard-forking, splitting English community into another one.

      A lot of FOSS project from non-English community often having hard time to broaden their community unless English community embrace them first. Helping non-English community also broaden FOSS community diversity and perspective, allowing them to collaborate and do cultural exchange.

      source
  • Gutek8134@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I’d like to try it out. Do you recommend some instance with English UI?

    source

    • Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      blahaj.zone uses Sharkey (which is a fork of Misskey)

      source
• xapr@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  If it helps, here’s a (partial) list of ActivityPub software - I’m not sure why it doesn’t include things like Friendica or Owncast: github.com/BasixKOR/awesome-activitypub

  But regarding your question, the first example that comes to mind is PeerTube. Not only does it look to me like it was designed from the start with federation in mind (I don’t know this for a fact though), but it also seems pretty innovative with its use of peer-to-peer video streaming. This 2 minute animated video does a good job of explaining what it does: framatube.org/…/217eefeb-883d-45be-b7fc-a788ad850…

  Owncast seems somewhat similar.

  It seems that most Fediverse/ActivityPub software is a “twist” on something that existed previously, but there is still a lot of innovation going on, instead of pure copies of existing centralized platforms.

  source
• muelltonne@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I think that we need to talk about the history of software and social software here, because the current status is kind of crazy:

  • Most of the big platforms didn’t invent what they are currently doing. Reddit is basically a forum. They had a great innovation with their voting idea, but functionally there is little difference between the many webforums we had before and Reddit
  • Twitter is a microblog, which already tells you about its origins. There were blogs before twitter, on their own servers, talking to each other with pingbacks and RSS
  • YouTube, well, basically just shows you videos, which of course was done before by people on their own servers

  So basically most fediverse is not emulating existing platforms, but trying to go back to an internet we had before the big platforms took everything over. And with ActivityPub we have the protocol to ease some of the pains that the decentralized internet before the web 2.0 era had. F.e. you had to create an account for each individual webforum, which really sucked if you just wanted to ask a question or share something. Reddit with its one login totally took over, because you could participate in many subforums. It was easier to just hop into /r/cooking to ask a question about your lasagna then to find the relevant lasagna forum and register there.

  source

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    This is helpful and I agree. You forgot Slack and IRC!

    I propose this breakdown of the basic software paradigms:

    • forum (Usenet, PHPBB, Reddit, YouTube, Discourse)
    • blog (Wordpress, Substack)
    • microblog (Twitter, Mastodon)
    • chatroom (IRC, Slack, Mattermost, Clubhouse if you count audio)

    God I hate it when people say “check my Substack”. It’s a blog dammit.

    source

    • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Slack actually runs on XMPP, as does Zoom and others… So yeah…

      source
  • Emperor@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    That’s my take on it too.

    Late Web 1.0/early Web 2.0 we had a diverse ecosystem of forums, wikis, blogs (micro and macro), etc. The next logically step would have been to invent a protocol to get them talking to each other. Instead, the Big Web offered everyone convenience as long as they were happy living inside their walled garden, which was fine until it wasn’t.

    We’re now just trying to fix the mistake of trusting the Big Web and get back to where we were before it all went wrong.

    See also: !webrevival@lemm.ee.

    source
• Skiluros@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Maybe mbin or piefed? They don’t exactly seem to have 1:1 copies among oligarch run services.

  source
• pls@lemmy.plaureano.nohost.me ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  A nice example is castopod.org

  source
• imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I don’t understand the question. Pretty much all fediverse software was built with federation in mind from the start. They all started from scratch afaik, nothing was built on top of a centralized design.

  They also happen to perform similar functions as earlier centralized websites, but that’s simply because those are the ways that people commonly prefer to use the internet. People use it to share photos, stream videos, connect with friends, microblog, blog, or browse content aggregators.

  There could definitely be new paradigms of internet usage waiting to be discovered, but if the fediverse can’t even replace the existing functionality of the web first, it’d be very ambitious to start building brand new types of sites already.

  source

  • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Not necessarily. Ghost, Wordpress, Flipboard and Tumblr are all adding federation to existing platforms. But I do agree that is the exception rather than the norm.

    source

    • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Yes this is good to know, I wasn’t aware of the background with some of the fediverse projects.

      source
    • muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      How well have they done their federation? Is it half passed and still half a walled garden?

      source
• ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  What’re you looking for that isn’t all the 20 some fediverse softwares?

  source

  • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    My interpretation is something that isn’t the fediverse version of something else. Like Lemmy doesn’t count because it’s the fediverse version of Reddit.

    source
  • rimu@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I guess NodeBB or Discourse would not qualify as they were forums that now have AP tacked on as an afterthought. Same for WordPress.

    But yeah all the big names are original, fediverse-first software.

    source