I hate mixing W with Wh.
Is it 211 MWh battery storage with maximum power output (peak, average, etc.) of 211 MW?
Submitted 1 year ago by Hugohase@startrek.website to energy@slrpnk.net
I hate mixing W with Wh.
Is it 211 MWh battery storage with maximum power output (peak, average, etc.) of 211 MW?
There is usually a 1:1 between MW:MWh at these capacities, to the point where the 1:2 presented on the article was the first time I’ve heard of another set up in Sweden.
It literally says in first paragraph “…in Sweden to deploy 211 MW / 211 MWh…”
= 1 h
It’s not a strictly technical megazine. That’s why I have doubts.
It very much looks like it is 211MW lasting for 1h giving 211MWh.
This looks exactly like I always imagined battery storage should look like, at least in a first step. Mid-sized batteries strategically distributed in the grid for frequency regulation/grid balancing.
Mihies@programming.dev 1 year ago
Sadly no info whatsoever on batteries.
AlsaValderaan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
I found this on it; still need to read through it. Some sort of lithium battery technology, it seems.
Hirom@beehaw.org 1 year ago
Li-Ion seems to be the go-to solution. I hope new static energy storage projects will prefer other options (Na-Ion, flow batteries, …) since there’s a limited supply of Lithium and we need it for vehicles.
houseofleft@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
I don’t know specifics on this battery farm, but almost all are essentially fleets of shipping containers filled with smaller batteries, rather than some super-cool-mega-battery, so it’s probably a safe assumption that this is a landmark project in scale, rather than in technology specifics.