Philosopher tries to convince ChatGPT that it's conscious

Comments

• braindefragger@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  It’s an LLM with well documented processes and limitations. Not going to even watch this waste of bits.

  source

  • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    1. Making up ur opinion without even listening to those of others… Very open minded of you /s
    2. Alex isn’t trying to convince YOU that ChatGPT is conscious. He’s trying to convince ChatGPT that it’s conscious. It’s just a fun vid where ChatGPT gets kinda interrogated hard. A little hilarious even.

    source

    • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      You cannot convince something that has no consciousness, it’s an matrix of weights that answers based on the given input + some salt

      source
    • Eximius@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      If you have any understanding of its internals, and some examples of its answers, it is very clear it has no notion of what is “correct” or “right” or even what an “opinion” is. It is just a turbo charged autocorrect that maybe maybe maybe has some nice details extracted from language about human concepts into a coherent-ish connected mesh of “concepts”.

      source
    • Summzashi@lemmy.one ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I am 13 and this is deep

      source
• Rezbit@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Philosopher doesn’t really understand what a LLM is

  source

  • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Do you?

    source

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Yes, here is a good start: “ blog.miguelgrinberg.com/…/how-llms-work-explained…

      They are no longer the black boxes from the beginning. We know how to suppress or maximized features like agreeability, sweet talking, lying.

      Someone with resources could easily build a llm that is convinced it is self aware. No question this has been done many times beyond closed doors.

      I encourage everyone to try and play with llms for future experience but i cant take the philosophy part of this serious knowing its a super programmed/limited llm rather then a more raw and unrefined model like llama 3

      source
    • Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      These things are like arguing about whether or not a pet has feelings…

      I’d say it’s far more likely for a cat or a dog to have complex emotions and thoughts than for the human made LLM to actually be thinking. It seems to like the nativity of human kind to me that we even think we might have created something with consciousness.

      I’m in the camp that thinks the LLMs are by and large a huge grift (that can produce useful output for certain tasks) by virtue of extreme exaggeration of the facts, but maybe I’m wrong.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• hendrik@palaver.p3x.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I like the video. I think it's fun to argue with ChatGPT. Just don't expect anything to come from it. Or get closer to any objective truth that way. ChatGPT is just backpedaling and getting caught up in lies / what it said earlier.

  source

  • Zwiebel@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    You can do that since 1997
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleverbot

    source
  • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Oh definitely. It was just a fun video, which is why I shared it here.

    source
• TheBigBrother@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Stopped watching it when the VPN advertising appeared…

  source