EXCLUSIVE: Cal State"Gender" Academic Inspired Pedophilic Fantasy On Castrating, Enslaving Young Boys - Reduxx

Comments

• BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  What the fuck did I just read.

  source

  • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Reduxx is a known anti-trans website. I didn’t see proof that the professors named were the ones who controlled the aliases.

    source

    • BananaSpike@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      The site makes it very easy to click through to the proof. For example, here’s kristoff at the eunuch archives claiming that he and two other members presented at a WPATH conference:

      You’re welcome. The WPATH conference has been interesting. Jesus, eunuchunique, and I all presented papers at the conference this AM. More later.

      Looking at the symposium guide from WPATH, you can see the people that presented:

      TRACK B Panel Presentations:

      Identity development. Eunuchs then and now. Organizer and Chair: Thomas W. Johnson. OAK AMPHITHEATRE

      Eunuchs: Seeking voluntary castration. Richard J. Wassersug, PhD.

      Eunuchs: Personality and sexuality. Thomas W. Johnson, PhD.

      Eunuchs: Body integrity identity disorder and castration. Krister Willette, PhD.

      Eunuchs: An historical perspective. Shaun Tougher, PhD.

      Case study of a transition from “male to not-male” or “male to eunuch” (MtE). Randall D. Ehrbar, PsyD.

      I don’t have any reason to doubt the rest of reduxx’s work in tying down the three usernames mentioned above to which of those 5 people presented, but here’s part of it if you’d like to look into this further:

      But according to posts made to the forum in March and April, Johnson let his identity slip and invited site members to partake in an academic survey on “childhood experiences, castration desire and sexual history,” as well as watch him give a talk at CSUC via Zoom.

      To me, the more important thing isn’t exact identities, but the fact that WPATH consulted with multiple child castration fetishists. That’s horrendous, and taints the entire organization’s work. As I said in another comment, this is the sort of thing that can turn back the clock on trans rights. Your average person will hear about this and think “trans = pedos”. WPATH badly needs to clean house.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • TruffleStuff@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    An article posted by a sock puppet.

    source

    • BananaSpike@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I do like socks, but I’m no puppet. I’m interested in discussion about this article because it looks legitimate, which is horrifying. If you’re able to disprove the claims, that would be a relief.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Alice@hilariouschaos.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Here’s my assumption of this article: A professor engages in deviant and illegal behaviors, participating in graphic contents that exploit children sexual using transgederism is a Catalyst.

  If you could just tell me what the main point is about this article I’d appreciate it. Genuinely I would. Because I’m not sure what the exact point is supposed to be after reading it.

  Anyway

  Going off of my assumption as I stated, I think it’s important NO MATTER WHAT THE TOPIC IS OK GUYS ? That when it ultimately comes to children there needs to be safeguards. I don’t care what the topics are. It could be sex, violence, guns, and the trans topic.

  anything that could be used to manipulate a growing mind, needs to be handled with zero bias and influence.

  do not influence children instead, teach them provide them BOTH sides of an argument no matter what. Let them come to their own conclusions. That is how shit should be anyway.

  The issue in my opinion is people personalize things. Making it about them and how their own personal experiences stand as ultimate fact.

  That is not genuine and it is harmful to others

  source

  • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Agreed, there is no point to this article except to seemingly ignore the incredibly problematic and disgusting pedo bend and focus instead on “eunuch” as a gender identity bothering the author.

    I don’t think it’s a political stance to say pedophilia is worse than an adult willingly cutting his junk off. Personally I don’t care what you do with your own body, but leave the kids out of this.

    Not sure why this was even posted, what the intent was, or why the focus wasn’t on the incredibly pedophilic and racist elements of the story written and instead raging on the choices adults make to their own bodies. Priorities, people.

    source

    • DarkDecay@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It’s all the right has, their party has done literally nothing but piss people off. These are the posts of a dying political party

      source
    • Kaboom@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I think its because of all the posts about pedo priests and the like. Reminding everyone that pedos are everywhere

      source
    • Alice@hilariouschaos.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I think there’s articles that better make the point OP was trying to make besides this one. This one confused me. As to why I felt compelled to make an assumption on it.

      The only problem I see with OP finding a source to better articulate and illustrate the point he’s trying to make, is that the media and the internet are heavily biased now.

      This may have been the only article he could find that was somewhere along the lines of the point he was trying to make.

      Just a guess.

      source
  • BananaSpike@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Your assumption doesn’t really capture the article. It’s not about a single pedophile, it’s about rot within WPATH, which might turn back the clock on trans rights.

    To summarize, WPATH published a new standard of care that removed lower age limits. It did this while consulting with at least one child castration fetishist, which is a huge and disgusting conflict of interest. WPATH should clean house and purge all pedophiles, retract SOC 8, publish an apology, and write a new version that doesn’t have input from known pedophiles.

    Aside from the pedophilia angle, the eunuch chapter was done while consulting with said eunuch fetishists. If WPATH is just publishing fetish material, maybe Ray Blanchard is right and trans people are just AGPs, trans women are just men in dresses, etc, etc. It’s a bad look.

    I don’t think it’s a good idea to ignore this. This is the sort of thing that can strongly influence public opinion.

    source