Archive link: archive.is/jk2GY
This is… weird, although it does fit the theory well. And fucking cool.
Submitted 6 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to physics@mander.xyz
Archive link: archive.is/jk2GY
This is… weird, although it does fit the theory well. And fucking cool.
sudoreboot@slrpnk.net 6 months ago
tl;dr:
I’m not entirely sure what they mean by having images of their waviness, because that is not how it works. You can not measure a quantum wave, because it isn’t a “particle” wave but a wave-like distribution of mutually exclusive measurement outcomes. Taking a picture is the same as entangling yourself, which embeds you in the quantum wave function such that it describes all possible combinations of you ending up with every possible outcome.
fossilesque@mander.xyz 6 months ago
arxiv.org/abs/2404.05699 There’s the paper I think.
sudoreboot@slrpnk.net 6 months ago
As I understand it, they are making measurements of an otherwise single isolated particle as it moves about in a controlled space, and the measurements confirm (yet again) that the measurement outcomes match the probabilities given by the Schrödinger equation, which means that it interferes with itself.
The language used may lead some to think that we now have images showing a wave-like particle, but again, that’s not something that can ever happen. What we have are boring old images of a single classical-looking particle, but the patterns they display tells us that quantum mechanics is very much at play in between the takes.