IBM Buys HashiCorp To Control The Alternative To Red Hat Kubernetes

Comments

• cas919@lemmynsfw.com ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Those are very different things….

  source

  • whodovoodoowedo@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Yea, I am very confused by the headline. Maybe if it compared Openshift to Kubernetes…

    source

    • impure9435@kbin.run ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      But Kubernetes has nothing to do with HasiCorp?

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• fcuks@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  pretty different things and also IBM owns Red Hat

  source

  • mosiacmango@lemm.ee ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Hashicorp’s Nomad was a k8s competitor. It was pretty nice tooling that was simplier than k8s, and directly supported vms, containers, war files, etc.

    source

    • tb_@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It’s pretty common for companies to buy up their competitors

      Capitalism “competition drives innovation” at its finest

      source
• simplejack@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’m tired and OP’s title case is messing with my brain.

  source
• erwan@lemmy.ml ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  The title is super confusing, it looks like Kubernetes is part of Red Hat

  source
• yildolw@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  If I were to rank HashiCorp’s products by importance, Nomad would not be at the top

  Of course, if I had ranked Red Hat’s products by importance at the time of acquisition, OpenShift would not have been at the top, so I am not a reliable ranker

  source