Comment - FBXL Lotide

Comment on we need the option for offline reading

pepecyb@hub.hubzilla.hu@hub.hubzilla.hu ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

In concrete terms, the idea would need to be implemented as a combination of an add-on (for ‘downloading’ the thread… a local SQLite database would be perfectly adequate for storage), which integrates into the Item menu, and a simple local server application for displaying and managing the offline threads. A simple local web server would also have the advantage of giving users the choice of which browser to use to view, search through and manage the archive, and it could be designed in such a way that it could be used properly even in purely text-based browsers (greetings to @citc@zotum.net 😉).

original

Sort:hotnew top

chris@im.allmendenetz.de ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
@Der Pepe (Hubzilla) ⁂ we have already the option to export content - but we can´t view it locally.

Concerning for exporting only certain threads:

I tried before to clip/download threads with the Joplin Web cipper (FF Browser addon) and archive HZ content in Joplin... it works somehow but not that good... but archiving HZ content with Joplin would still be a great thing if it would work better.
I find Joplin in many ways a very useful local application.

It would be also great to have the option to export Joplin content to Hubzilla with one click...

So maybe a HZ Joplin Addon would be a way to get both things - an offline reader and offline creator for HZ content... As Joplin has also mobile apps this addon would work as a result also as some kind of HZ mobile App :-)
original
- pepecyb@hub.hubzilla.hu@hub.hubzilla.hu ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  I’d understood it to mean that we were talking about archiving individual, complete threads offline. The export function isn’t any help here, as it only backs up your own content.
  
  Joplin is a brilliant application, which I myself use extensively, including with the Firefox add-on. An add-on that integrates with Joplin should be possible, but it would require a thorough understanding of Joplin.
  original
citc@zotum.net@zotum.net ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
@Der Pepe (Hubzilla) ⁂
a local SQLite database would be perfectly adequate for storage)

Why would this be necessary?
Thought of the e-mail analogy where messages are accessible via 'mbox' format.
original
- pepecyb@hub.hubzilla.hu@hub.hubzilla.hu ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  That was my first thought too. The downside is that you’d have to pack the thread’s items into separate files in a suitable format (JSON would be the obvious choice), which would then also have to maintain the parent-child relationship so that the threads are structured correctly when displayed. SQLite would therefore be a good option, as it is simply a text file (albeit monolithic), and you could easily adopt the item’s database structure from the Hub without having to implement a major conversion to your own format within the add-on. Alternatively, it would also be possible to incorporate an export function into the local app to a specific single-file format (which would still need to be specified), should the need arise.
  original