Comment on Trump promotes family's new crypto platform, 'The Defiant Ones'

• dhork@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  The PEE market is far less liquid than I would have expected

  source
• IcePee@lemmy.beru.co ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I think I didn’t make myself clear. When I said “by volume” I meant was the amount of value the different systems hold and the amount of if not outright fraud, negative aspects of the systems. The fiat money systems’ money supply has a fundamental weakness, it can be created out of thin air so is constantly loosing value. Think of all the investment vehicles or other assets that tie themselves to this loosing value asset. Trillions in USD. And what’s it all backed by? Ultimately guns. Well most crypto currency is backed by maths and no matter how many guns you point at it, you cannot make 2+2= anything other than 4.

  source

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Well most crypto currency is backed by maths and no matter how many guns you point at it, you cannot make 2+2= anything other than 4.

    Sure, you can make one type of coin or other rare or rate limited or whatever, but you can also just make up a different shit coin and give yourself a metric shit ton of that new coin, and then eventually try to move to either a more stable coin or back into fiat once you’ve gotten enough suckers holding the bag to exit.

    That makes crypto ultimately not based on maths at all, but based on hype, stupidity, and scams alone.

    source

    • IcePee@lemmy.beru.co ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      The main difference between these “shit coins” and fiat is once the shit coin scammers eventually pull the rug, they cannot just print more of that coin. Fiat scammers can just print more of that currency.

      But in both situations one does need to look at the economics of the coins, and the priors of the people in control.

      source

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        “Once they’ve completed the scam they have to move onto other scams.”

        Are you even thinking at all when constructing these arguments?

        source