You wouldn't dare!
Comment on Private voting has been added to PieFed
imaqtpie@piefed.social 4 weeks agoJust upvoted myself but nobody else knows 🤫
can@piefed.social 4 weeks ago
Socsa@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
You don’t even need to message an admin. You can just ban the agent doing the voting.
mp3@lemmy.ca 4 weeks ago
arcuru@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
This puts the privacy shield in the hands of a users instance admin. I like that approach, but I’m sure others will disagree.
doctortran@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
This is more or less how it worked on Reddit. The admins handled vote spam or abuse, there was absolutely no expectation for moderators to have that information because the admins were dealing with the abuse cases. Moderators only concerned themselves with content and comments, the voting was the heart of how the whole thing works, and therefore only admins could see and affect them. Least privilege, basically.
I think a side effect of this, though, is that it increases the responsibility on admins to only federate with instances that have active and cooperative admins. It increases their responsibilities and demands active monitoring, which isn’t a bad thing, but I worry about how the instances that federates openly by default will continue to operate.
If you have to trust the admins, how do you handle new admins, or increasingly absent ones? What if their standards for what constitutes “harassment” don’t match yours? Does the whole instances get defederated? What if it’s a large instance, where communities will be cut off?
I don’t ask any of this as a way to put down this effort because I very, very much want to see this change, but there’s gonna be hurtles that have to be overcome
Ultimately I think the best solution would need assistance from the devs but I’m lieu of that, we have to make due.