Comment on I just wanted to take a moment to enjoy how clean the web can be

• ladfrombrad@lemdro.id ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  It’s not just a warning, it’s also an option to reject.

  Some don’t give you an option, but actually have a much cleaner interface imo.

  Image

  Whether or not it’s better since you still have to click OK, some don’t let you reject them at all.

  source

  • SirSnuggleBottom@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Also, some researchers found out that nearly two thirds of the top 1000 websites don’t even honor your selection. If you say only necessary cookies they ignore it and still track you. Shocker.

    source

    • ladfrombrad@lemdro.id ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      No fuggin doubt.

      And you know what irks me more is when you buy things from places like eBay or other third party seller websites (where you’ve consented to their cookies/terms) your email address you use with them is then in the hands of a goofball who’s had their personal business PC been compromised.

      The few times I use eBay the email addy I use on their sees my inbox flooded. Fucking shitshow.

      source
  • Nurgus@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    If they don’t allow you to reject in two clicks then they’re violating the EU regulation.

    source

    • AA5B@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I wish I could get my EU representatives to act on those! Oh right, I live on a different continent in a country that lets businesses run amuck

      source
    • ladfrombrad@lemdro.id ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I’m aware of that, but I’m just pointing out many websites do not give you the consent options as stated above which imo are much more annoying.

      source

      • Nurgus@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Ah, fair enough then.

        source
  • FooBarrington@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    If you can’t reject, they either don’t need the pop-up, or they’re not in compliance with the law. Either way it’s in no way the fault of the lawmakers.

    source