Comment on Pornhub Sues Texas Over Age Verification Law

mojo@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• Master@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  and then those same people who want it banned close their curtains and start watching it.

  source

  • mojo@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Like all these child protecting puritans who end up being pedophiles and sex traffickers lol

    source

    • Uranium3006@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      They're predators who are paranoid someone's gonna take away "their" prey

      source
  • Techmaster@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Ban curtains!

    source
• theneverfox@pawb.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Oh, don’t forget kosa, it has bipartisan support

  They want to hold sites responsible for children accessing NSFW content on them. Which means ID of some kind

  It would also apply to user posted content

  source
• xc2215x@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Christian conservatives want it banned for sure.

  source
• Buelldozer@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I doubt it could be actually banned. The US had this fight decades ago and Porn was given 1A protections. If they could ban it they would but they can’t so they are doing the next best thing by making it inconvenient and uncomfortable for people to get to.

  source

  • mojo@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    The problem though is that all those things we fought for before and being rolled back. You could have said the same about abortion, but then we regressed because of religious extremists.

    source
• MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Coomers crying fascism because kids can’t jerk off to sexually trafficked women.😐

  source

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    If you think these bills will do anything to stop teens from accessing porn or women from being trafficked, I have a bridge to sell you. And if you think Republicans actually care about the health and well-being of vulnerable women, I have an even more luxurious bridge to sell you.

    source

    • ShakyPerception@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      you have TWO bridges?!?

      source

      • rikudou@lemmings.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I mean, do you not?

        source
      • ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        “Gee Bill!” etc.

        source
  • LexiconBexicon@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    When we started opening up about sexuality, sexual assaults tanked. It also tanked when we started teaching sex ed to kids

    source

    • MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      There’s a difference between sex ed and having them jerk off to porn, much less encouraging them with unrealistic expectations on sex.

      source

      • Notorious_handholder@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        That sounds like a parents job then… Like shouldn’t the parents be the ones keeping up with what their kids access and look at on the internet to make sure they don’t access that stuff then? Shouldn’t they be, you know parenting them instead of letting the state parent everyone else for their failures?

        I thought as an American adult I could do whatever I wanted within my legal rights free from government over reach.

        Now I’m being told I have to give my personal ID to a non-government website (to eventually get hacked and leaked, hurray another vector of ID theft being opened up!)… Because other people can’t properly take care of their kids or take 15 minutes out of their day to set up a network filter like my parents did? Or even, you know… Just talk plainly to their kid…like growing up I saw blood and guts and gore from films (fictional entertainment and educational ones played at school) but my parents took the time to explain the things I see and interacted with in the world

        This is gross government overreach and is entirely anthetical to American ideals. And as much as I hate the slippery slope argument, do you really trust the American government to not abuse the precedent being set here and expand on it?

        This whole thing feels gross. Imagine the government later on starts saying that you have to have mandatory ID and facial scans to access certain websites. Imagine they use that to track down individuals who made aggressive or hyperbolic comments such as expressing dislike for a political party or person. I can imagine so many scenarios where this just goes from bad to worse that I can’t type fast enough. The potential for something like this to slowly or even rapidly become abusable is infinite since we already have countries enacting on these models that started out with these same or similar requirements before ramping up.

        Combine this with the stuff Google is trying to do and oh man, the future looks bleak for free internet and communication and the further enrichment of the elite and powerful… Road to hell is paved with good intentions and all that

        source
  • mojo@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Think you meant to sign up on lemmygrad.ml

    source

    • MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      🤮

      source
  • Jaysyn@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    LOL, you went with a strawman & personal attack because you know your actual argument is garbage.

    source

    • MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      It’s incredibly hard to change an Intelligent mans mind. It’s impossible to change an stupid mans mind.

      source

      • LexiconBexicon@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Did you just come from reddit with that lame cliché

        source

        • -> View More Comments