Comment on Musk's X sues advertisers over alleged 'massive advertiser boycott' .
BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 1 month agoTo quote Legal Eagle on Nebula: it depends. Suppose that the customers had a deal with Twitter granting them special pricing, but on the condition that they spend a certain amount during a given period. Then the customers could be breaching the terms of the contract by dropping out halfway through. I’m not saying that’s what’s happening here, and IANAL of course, but it seems plausible to me.
LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 month ago
So what you are thinking is all the media outlets are so shit they didn’t read the case and none of them found it saying, breach of contract. Could be true with how a lot of reporting goes these days, but why would the lawyers not just said, this suit is about breach of contract, not conspiracy to boycott a poor billionaires company he is embezzling money to through Tesla?
BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
I haven’t read the case either. But what I do know is the news media isn’t always as nuanced in their reporting of court cases, as the cases warrants.
If that is the case here I don’t know. Musk is a POS, so everything is definitely possible. All I’m saying is that if it actually is a breach of contract, then Musk could have a case.
But imagine signing a contract, where you have to buy a set amount of advertising, with no clause about the site’s conduct and reputation.