Comment on Microsoft says Delta’s ancient IT explains long outage after CrowdStrike snafu
reddig33@lemmy.world 5 months ago
That’s strange. Southwest Airline’s ancient IT actually saved them from crowdstrike.
Comment on Microsoft says Delta’s ancient IT explains long outage after CrowdStrike snafu
reddig33@lemmy.world 5 months ago
That’s strange. Southwest Airline’s ancient IT actually saved them from crowdstrike.
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 months ago
Debunked.
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Ironically it debunks it by saying, yes, Southwest has key scheduling applications running on 3.1 and 95.
FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 months ago
No it doesn’t, nowhere does it say that.
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 months ago
That kind of language will get you kicked in the balls by engineers. Sure. It should make it “clear” that they’re not running on *this OS or that OS.
And what should also be made clear is that statement is an assumption. A probable one, IMO, a reasonable one, but an assumption nonetheless and therefore no one can call it a fact unless they just want to pretend to be right.
I ojbect to using language like “it looks like a thing so it’s OBVIOUSLY a thing, you morons” being presented as irrefutable evidence of some sort.
The fact that it’s an assumption should further make it clear that no, this is not a fact, and stating it as a fact is bullshit or deliberate misrepresentation.
kalleboo@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Where does it say that? It says that the source says that they are mobile apps (so obviously NOT Windows) that “look like they were designed for Windows 95”.
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I don’t know what “look historic” is supposed to mean, but if it looks like it was developed on Windows 95 that’s 99% of the time because it was developed on Windows 95. Mobile apps “are available” wasn’t as definitive as perhaps the author intended - meaning what, exactly? It’s an option?
If it’s a homegrown app (and good for them if so - every weasel IT manager in the world has been trying to bring them down for it since day one I’ll bet), and it was written originally for Win95 and it’s still in use, the bet would be it’s run inside a VM on whatever they use now. Should whatever they use now go into a boot loop - theoretically - they could run it natively if they had to.
All speculation of course.
TeoTwawki@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Omg its so hard to reboot into safemode delete one bad file and then reboot again. SO HARD guys. So lets run windows 3.1 and windows 95 and deploy old crusty windows 2008 servers again till this vlows over. /s
I’m in IT for a living. Even my dimmest bulbs at my company were able to solve this and keep the same pc running, minus crowdstrike’s bad update. I struggle to imagine what it must be like for other companies IT staff to make the choices they did during this.
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Complexity increases exponentially in large organizations, for a number of reasons.
FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 months ago
Yes, yes it is if you run bitlocker with external verification.
lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 5 months ago
…and just how many PCs do you intend to “reboot into safemode delete one bad file and then reboot again”? Manually, or do you have some remote access tool that doesn’t require a running system?