Notice how you said “a problem with” and the article said “implying that”. There is some ambiguity. The issue is narrowed down but still not explicit.
Notice how you said “a problem with” and the article said “implying that”. There is some ambiguity. The issue is narrowed down but still not explicit.
partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Of course there’s still some ambiguity. They’re likely investigating many things in parallel right now and cautiously assessing impact and scope. Their language suggests they think they’ve got the full picture, but they’re likely still exploring some niche areas to be safe.
They’ve given public statements on the general area of the issue and its limited scope. I think your expectations on this issue at this point about perfect transparency are a bit unrealistic for a publicly traded company.
tabular@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Less an expectation and more of an ideal standard to strive for. Which I would think it’s in our best interest as future customers to have the highest expectations.
partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Well you’re certainly welcome to hold that opinion. I don’t think you’re recognizing the gravity of what you’re expecting them to commit to and also you’re setting yourself up for repeated disappointment.