Comment

Comment on AMD delays its Ryzen 9000 launch due to unspecified quality issue — new launch in August; chipmaker pulls back all units shipped globally for quality checks

<- View Parent

empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

I’d say it’s actually a better market signal rather than indications of huge problems. “See, our competitiors send out defective products; we are holding back to make sure ours ship correctly.”

That’s exactly what enterprise/datacenter customers want to hear: a dedication to stability.

source

Sort:hotnew top

lemmeout@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Nah something fishy

source
- AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Any large scale manufacturer like AMD knows about what % of defective returns they get. They’re using the heat on Intel to help make their numbers look better.
  
  source
  - lemmeout@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Actually, I think it’s not about defect numbers. This is about delaying until Intel releases the microcode update. They want to be compared after the (potentially) performance tanking update from Intel. Which is hilarious because Intel gave a date after AMD’s initial launch date.
    
    I think it’s also fair as a lot of reviewers aren’t going to bother retesting after Intel releases updates and comparing with AMD after the 9000 series hype has died down, if they had just recently did so for the AMD launch.
    
    source
    DacoTaco@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    … You just contradicted yourself there with the timeline/dates lol
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- Woovie@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Hanlon’s razor, don’t overthink it. No need for mindless conspiracy theories based on zero data. If it’s aajor concern we’ll hear something no doubt.
  
  source
  - sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    I think you mean Occam’s Razor. AMD signaling responsibility is a simpler explanation as a “dunk” on Intel, them having a similar issue as Intel seems far too coincidental. They’re on completely different nodes, so there’s no reason their issues would be related.
    
    So my take is that AMD thinks Intel’s fix is going to degrade performance significantly, so they want to wait to ensure their launch is as impactful as possible (bigger perf delta, more time to find hardware issues, etc). If AMD can show strength and reliability while Intel suffers, they could snap up much more market share (and improve product availability at launch).
    
    source
- lowleveldata@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  no u
  
  source
- DogWater@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Coincidences are real my guy.
  
  source