This is most of my memory of Canadian elections too. I wish even mentioning other parties wasn’t allowed in campagin material, like how in some parts of government politicians can only refer to each other by title and not by name.
Comment on A Black woman has never lost the general election for POTUS in US history but 46 white men have lost
halvar@lemm.ee 3 months agoFrom what I see most elections always are.
Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Ok, but then who informs the public about the other party actually doing something bad
Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
Debates and actually adressing the problems.
You can’t say “Party X just wants your money”, try “Our party will help you keep your money”, or even “Unlike some parties today, we will put your taxes to good use”.
It’s a lot harder to make a compelling attack without a concrete focus. “Some parties are corrupt” is so trivially true that’s it embarassing, but “Party X is corrupt” is a rallying cry.
It won’t prevent lies by any means, but since specific claims can only be nade about your own party it gives an advantage to talking about your own party instead of every ad being incredibly negative claims one step off of a flame war. Hopefully that leads to building a strong case and then defending that case during debates, but at least the ads will have less direct negativity.
Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 months ago
It would be more positive, but potentially less accurate. A party that does a lot of very specific and bad stuff but has some vaguely good policies to point towards would beat a neutral party, even if they shouldn’t.
Vinny_93@lemmy.world 3 months ago
It’s not what I’m used to in the Netherlands. There are personal attacks sometimes, but mostly by guys who don’t have the best reputation in the first place.