Then you do not get licensed and cannot work on certain projects that may require a licensed or accredited team.
Licensure isn’t about how good you are. It’s about ensuring that you, as a professional, understand the ramifications of your contributions to the work you do and the field you are a part of and accepting the responsibility of those ramifications. Continuing education is also a huge part of it but I don’t think software engineers have much issue there.
HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 months ago
Do we allow for self taught doctors or accountants?
Also, these regulations aren’t being developed for all servers, just ones that can cause major economic damage if they stop functioning. And you don’t need everyone to be qualified to run the service. How many water treatment pants are there where you only have a small set of managers running the plant, but most people aren’t licensed to do so?
aidan@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Is this limitation good? Furthermore, software development is something very easy to learn with 0 consequences.
Many of those have excellent self-taught devs developing software for them- I know some of them.
Maintenance is very different from software development.
Good software development requires at minimum expansive automated testing…
HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 months ago
Do you trust anyone claiming to be self taught with the responsibility to design something that, if it fails, will cause billions in economic damage? Not the people you know, anyone who claims to be self taught?
aidan@lemmy.world 3 months ago
I shouldn’t be trusted if I hire without vetting and hand over control of a massive project to someone off the street without any QA controls, code review, or automated testing.